Qualcomm's new Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme and Elite chips for PCs stretch up to a record 5 GHz — 3nm Arm chips sport new Oryon Prime cores

Snapdragon X2 Elite/Extreme
(Image credit: Qualcomm)
30
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

With contributions from
  • Notton
    Oh hey, a chip maker finally tried out a triple-channel (technically 6), 192-bit DDR5 mem bus.
    I hope that means the Adreno X2-90 can push some numbers.
    The X1-85 was middling in 2023, much less 2024 when it actually launched.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Cool. Hope to see some ~~ATX boards this time around.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    At normalized power, Qualcomm says it offers up to 75% more performance than its competitors. In multitasking, it claims the new chips will offer up to 31% faster performance at a normalized ISO power, while needing 43% less power than last-gen chips. We don't yet have benchmarks to share, and Qualcomm didn't note the exact TDPs for these chips.

    Big deal, they're still way too expensive for what you get. Between Apple M4 and modern Windows x86 chips there's just way too much tradeoff to go Windows Snapdragon instead for the crazy price some manufacturers (Microsoft especially) want for them, and that's not even considering things like compatibility and gaming (even light gaming), and the fact that they're not exactly hugely more battery efficient than some x86 models as TH and TG pointed out in their reviews.

    People wanted Snapdragon to bring Apple M levels of performance, battery life, and price to Windows, and it has not delivered.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    The article said:
    After a fairly quiet 2025 on the mobile front, it’ll also be nice to have some fresh silicon to test.
    Arrow Lake-H launched this year. You wouldn't know it by browsing ark.intel.com, where the index seems to be missing a couple generations, but here:
    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/241749/intel-core-ultra-5-processor-225h-18m-cache-up-to-4-90-ghz/specifications.html
    Ryzen AI Max (Strix Halo) also launched this year. That was a pretty big deal, IMO.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Notton said:
    Oh hey, a chip maker finally tried out a triple-channel (technically 6), 192-bit DDR5 mem bus.
    I assume you know that Intel did that back in the Nahelem era, right? It did seem to be a one-off.

    Funny enough, I seem to recall I even mentioned the idea of Snapdragon going up to triple-channel, in another recent thread about either that or the A19 benchmark leaks. Can't seem to find it, though. (Edit: I think it was actually about a future Nvidia SoC potentially using 3x SOCAMM to reach 384-bits).

    Anyway, Apple dropped the DRAM data width of its M3 Pro to 192-bits, whereas the M1 Pro and M2 Pro were both 256-bits.
    https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-M3-Pro-12-Core-Processor-Benchmarks-and-Specs.781711.0.htmlSo, there's your example using LPDDR5X.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    I'm a little surprised to see BlueTooth 5.4 there. BlueTooth 6 has started to roll out in other ARM based SoCs.
    Reply
  • usertests
    JamesJones44 said:
    I'm a little surprised to see BlueTooth 5.4 there. BlueTooth 6 has started to roll out in other ARM based SoCs.
    So many features are optional in Bluetooth, I wouldn't be surprised if you could bump the version number with no changes to the hardware or drivers (again).
    Reply
  • DougMcC
    What's the point of introducing a chip today without BT6? It's a year old by now, and everyone wants it for their next phone/buds pairing. They aren't going to settle for less on a laptop!
    Reply
  • kealii123
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Big deal, they're still way too expensive for what you get. Between Apple M4 and modern Windows x86 chips there's just way too much tradeoff to go Windows Snapdragon instead for the crazy price some manufacturers (Microsoft especially) want for them, and that's not even considering things like compatibility and gaming (even light gaming), and the fact that they're not exactly hugely more battery efficient than some x86 models as TH and TG pointed out in their reviews.

    People wanted Snapdragon to bring Apple M levels of performance, battery life, and price to Windows, and it has not delivered.
    By some accounts, Qualcomm charges half what AMD and Intel charge their vendors
    Reply
  • kealii123
    If those GPU claims are true, partner with Valve to put it on a SteamOS handheld. Thats going to get you better ARM compatibility than with Windows.

    The gen 1 SD Elite chip, when running a native ARM game or a highly compatible one, had performance about as good as AMD's 780m (what powers the Asus Ally and Legion Go)
    Reply