Intel quietly confirms Raptor Lake Next CPUs through internal driver publication — LGA 1700 chips also appear in shipping manifests dating back to August
DDR4 support and presumably affordable prices should be a boon for extant Socket 1700 system owners
Intel has published an internal test driver with the "RPL-NEXT" label, presumably in reference to Raptor Lake Next CPUs that Tom's Hardware first reported on in June. On the same day as the driver was uncovered, shipping manifests from Vietnam were published by Club386, showing exports of CPUs labeled "Raptor Lake Next" dating back to August, complete with cache and clock speed information.
➡️ https://t.co/jatYVFZ9egOctober 26, 2026
The driver was first spotted by @momomo_us on X, and we were able to find it by searching the name in Intel's software database. The file is locked (hence the padlock icon), and clicking on it will redirect you to an Intel login page. Given that and the "testbuild" label, it looks like this is an internal driver test that wasn't meant to be published.
Judging by the existing conventions, the driver package is for the Smart Sound Technology (SST), a audio digital signal processor integrated into the silicon since the Alder Lake days. Audio codecs like those of Realtek use SST for offloading duties like noise reduction, echo cancellation, low-power audio playback, and wake-on-voice without adding to the CPU load, and saving precious watts in the process.
For broader context, Raptor Lake Next is Intel's refresh of the Raptor family of CPUs, meant to plug into existing LGA-1700 motherboards. Given the currently insane DDR5 memory prices, gamers ought to be happy on two fronts: getting newer chips for their existing motherboards, and the ability to use more affordable DDR4 instead, an ability all but confirmed by Gigabyte's recent BIOS updates.
According to Club386's shipping manifests, there are so far four chip models en route from Intel's Vietnam facilities. Their specs suggest that they're replacements for extant Core i5 and Core i7 models, as a previous leak indicates that Intel doesn't yet have any plans for replacements for its Core i9-14900K chip.
As such, the listed models should top out with the 99DLMV part number, with 16 cores in an 8P + 8E arrangement, a meaty 3.5 GHz base block, and 30 MB of cache (presumably L3). This is the only model with a 125W TDP, and its base clock is higher than that of the Core i9-14900K, so it should be a speedy enough affair despite not having the high core counts of the halo models. Chances are it'll be a nice gaming CPU with pretty high turbo clocks, but only reviews will confirm that.
Interestingly, the 99DLMT has 20 cores (8P + 12E), but its much lower 65W TDP and 2.1 GHz base clock, which indicate that this model might be an efficiency-oriented productivity chip. In the table below, we added our guesses as to which models match existing chips.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Part number |
Cores / Threads |
TDP |
Base clock |
Cache |
Approximate matches |
99DLMV |
8P + 8E (24) |
125 W |
3.5 GHz |
30 MB |
i7-14700 / i7-13700 |
99DLMT |
8P + 12E (28) |
65 W |
2.1 GHz |
33 MB |
i5-14600K / 13700K |
99DLMW |
6P + 4E (16) |
65 W |
2.6 GHz |
24 MB |
i5-14400 / i5-13500 |
99DLMX |
n/a |
65 W |
2.6 GHz |
24 MB |
As above |
There's no word about pricing, but we'd expect the new chips to ring in at roughly the prices of the existing models. As points of reference, the Core i7-14700 is currently $366, or $330 for the "F" variant without integrated graphics. At the lower end of the above table, the Core i5-14400 is sitting at $208, or only $161 without an IGP.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Bruno Ferreira is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has decades of experience with PC hardware and assorted sundries, alongside a career as a developer. He's obsessed with detail and has a tendency to ramble on the topics he loves. When not doing that, he's usually playing games, or at live music shows and festivals.
- Jake Roach Senior Analyst, CPUs
-
thestryker I believe the 8P/8E is the only one destined for retail and it should slot in between the 14600K and 14700K. The base frequency matches that of the 14600K which makes it higher than any other 8P-core parts (ADL/RPL/RPL-R). The rest are likely rebrands for Intel's OEM partners.Reply -
helper800 Reply
If you dont need the excess E cores, it should be as fast as a 14900k in single threaded performance, and decently faster than you 12900k even in multicore workloads. We shall see if we ever see them released.Jabberwocky79 said:No 14900K? Booo -
User of Computers As a DDR4 13900K user, I don't really see the purpose of this. I already did an in-socket upgrade from a 12100F to a 13900K when it was on a great sale, and I don't see how these CPUs will offer me anything in particular.Reply -
usertests Reply
It increases the amount of CPUs out there which is good for anyone using the socket.User of Computers said:As a DDR4 13900K user, I don't really see the purpose of this. I already did an in-socket upgrade from a 12100F to a 13900K when it was on a great sale, and I don't see how these CPUs will offer me anything in particular.
It also effectively guarantees a supply of non-damaged CPUs for the used market. Any Raptor Lake + Refresh CPU could have been affected by degradation, while Raptor Lake Next with new names SHOULD be undamaged because they'll all have been released after microcode updates. -
logainofhades ReplyUser of Computers said:As a DDR4 13900K user, I don't really see the purpose of this. I already did an in-socket upgrade from a 12100F to a 13900K when it was on a great sale, and I don't see how these CPUs will offer me anything in particular.
This will be for those still on LGA 1700, still using a 12th gen CPU, or anyone that wants to reuse DDR4, and are an older rig. There are still plenty of 7th-11th gen users out there, that could benefit from having another option. -
helper800 Reply
I think my buddy is finally going to upgrade his 12700k he got on release some years ago. He will see decent single threaded improvements and mor major multi-threaded.usertests said:It increases the amount of CPUs out there which is good for anyone using the socket.
It also effectively guarantees a supply of non-damaged CPUs for the used market. Any Raptor Lake + Refresh CPU could have been affected by degradation, while Raptor Lake Next with new names SHOULD be undamaged because they'll all have been released after microcode updates. -
User of Computers Reply
That's honestly the real argument here. Raptor Lake and Raptor Lake-R both had SKU stacks that were pretty thorough and didn't leave much room for "new" SKUs, making it less compelling for potential buyers of this new series (as they could theoretically get a very similar SKU for the same or less money). This was the reason I didn't like the claims of AM4 "launches" in 2024, 2025, and even this year. They aren't actually launching anything new, yet people still ate it up and called AM4 a "ten-year socket". It wasn't. It lasted for 3 Zen generations (which itself is impressive-- don't get me wrong), and was subsequently superceded by AM5.usertests said:It also effectively guarantees a supply of non-damaged CPUs for the used market. Any Raptor Lake + Refresh CPU could have been affected by degradation, while Raptor Lake Next with new names SHOULD be undamaged because they'll all have been released after microcode updates.
The exploding RPL sitiation resolves this by actually providing these "new" chips a reason to exist-- they (hopefully) won't blow up out of the box and can be reliable processors. -
User of Computers Reply
But the option was already there for them to either do an in-socket upgrade or buy a B660 board and a 14700K. I'm playing devil's advocate here because I didn't like this rhetoric when it came to AM4 and I sense it being used here. That being said, it still has a reason to exist for the reasons usetests outlined.logainofhades said:This will be for those still on LGA 1700, still using a 12th gen CPU, or anyone that wants to reuse DDR4, and are an older rig. There are still plenty of 7th-11th gen users out there, that could benefit from having another option.