Intel quietly confirms Raptor Lake Next CPUs through internal driver publication — LGA 1700 chips also appear in shipping manifests dating back to August

13th Gen Raptor Lake CPU
(Image credit: Intel)
13

Intel has published an internal test driver with the "RPL-NEXT" label, presumably in reference to Raptor Lake Next CPUs that Tom's Hardware first reported on in June. On the same day as the driver was uncovered, shipping manifests from Vietnam were published by Club386, showing exports of CPUs labeled "Raptor Lake Next" dating back to August, complete with cache and clock speed information.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Bruno Ferreira
Contributor

Bruno Ferreira is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has decades of experience with PC hardware and assorted sundries, alongside a career as a developer. He's obsessed with detail and has a tendency to ramble on the topics he loves. When not doing that, he's usually playing games, or at live music shows and festivals.

With contributions from
  • thestryker
    I believe the 8P/8E is the only one destined for retail and it should slot in between the 14600K and 14700K. The base frequency matches that of the 14600K which makes it higher than any other 8P-core parts (ADL/RPL/RPL-R). The rest are likely rebrands for Intel's OEM partners.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Glad to see Intel giving LGA 1700 some lovin.
    Reply
  • Jabberwocky79
    No 14900K? Booo
    Reply
  • helper800
    Jabberwocky79 said:
    No 14900K? Booo
    If you dont need the excess E cores, it should be as fast as a 14900k in single threaded performance, and decently faster than you 12900k even in multicore workloads. We shall see if we ever see them released.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    As a DDR4 13900K user, I don't really see the purpose of this. I already did an in-socket upgrade from a 12100F to a 13900K when it was on a great sale, and I don't see how these CPUs will offer me anything in particular.
    Reply
  • usertests
    User of Computers said:
    As a DDR4 13900K user, I don't really see the purpose of this. I already did an in-socket upgrade from a 12100F to a 13900K when it was on a great sale, and I don't see how these CPUs will offer me anything in particular.
    It increases the amount of CPUs out there which is good for anyone using the socket.

    It also effectively guarantees a supply of non-damaged CPUs for the used market. Any Raptor Lake + Refresh CPU could have been affected by degradation, while Raptor Lake Next with new names SHOULD be undamaged because they'll all have been released after microcode updates.
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    User of Computers said:
    As a DDR4 13900K user, I don't really see the purpose of this. I already did an in-socket upgrade from a 12100F to a 13900K when it was on a great sale, and I don't see how these CPUs will offer me anything in particular.

    This will be for those still on LGA 1700, still using a 12th gen CPU, or anyone that wants to reuse DDR4, and are an older rig. There are still plenty of 7th-11th gen users out there, that could benefit from having another option.
    Reply
  • helper800
    usertests said:
    It increases the amount of CPUs out there which is good for anyone using the socket.

    It also effectively guarantees a supply of non-damaged CPUs for the used market. Any Raptor Lake + Refresh CPU could have been affected by degradation, while Raptor Lake Next with new names SHOULD be undamaged because they'll all have been released after microcode updates.
    I think my buddy is finally going to upgrade his 12700k he got on release some years ago. He will see decent single threaded improvements and mor major multi-threaded.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    usertests said:
    It also effectively guarantees a supply of non-damaged CPUs for the used market. Any Raptor Lake + Refresh CPU could have been affected by degradation, while Raptor Lake Next with new names SHOULD be undamaged because they'll all have been released after microcode updates.
    That's honestly the real argument here. Raptor Lake and Raptor Lake-R both had SKU stacks that were pretty thorough and didn't leave much room for "new" SKUs, making it less compelling for potential buyers of this new series (as they could theoretically get a very similar SKU for the same or less money). This was the reason I didn't like the claims of AM4 "launches" in 2024, 2025, and even this year. They aren't actually launching anything new, yet people still ate it up and called AM4 a "ten-year socket". It wasn't. It lasted for 3 Zen generations (which itself is impressive-- don't get me wrong), and was subsequently superceded by AM5.

    The exploding RPL sitiation resolves this by actually providing these "new" chips a reason to exist-- they (hopefully) won't blow up out of the box and can be reliable processors.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    logainofhades said:
    This will be for those still on LGA 1700, still using a 12th gen CPU, or anyone that wants to reuse DDR4, and are an older rig. There are still plenty of 7th-11th gen users out there, that could benefit from having another option.
    But the option was already there for them to either do an in-socket upgrade or buy a B660 board and a 14700K. I'm playing devil's advocate here because I didn't like this rhetoric when it came to AM4 and I sense it being used here. That being said, it still has a reason to exist for the reasons usetests outlined.
    Reply