Intel Panther Lake-H high-res die shot emerges — image show 18A compute tile, Xe3 GPU tile in new X-series processors

Intel
(Image credit: Intel)
6

While Intel formally introduced its Core Ultra 300-series processors codenamed Panther Lake-H in January, and even with shipments of several SKUs to partners, it has never revealed its die shots. Fortunately, Kurnal-Insights.com (a website ran by @KurnalSalts) has filled the gap and published annotated die shots of all three tiles that make up Intel's Panther Lake-H processor, including the compute tile made on 18A process technology, the Xe3 graphics tile, and the I/O tile.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Dustyboy1492
    Lot's of real estate for NPU's that most people don't use.
    Reply
  • usertests
    As for the GPU tile, it integrates 12 Intel Xe3 clusters and 16MB of L2 cache implemented in eight tiles
    That's huge for the graphics. No wonder it's so fast.
    Reply
  • Notton
    If I did my math right...
    GPU die: 55.19mm²
    CPU die: 115.13mm²
    I/O die: 49.76mm²

    That GPU is quite small for its capabilities.

    On the other hand, Strix Halo is 307.58mm² for 40CU GPU + mem controller + I/O, and with 2x 67.02mm² CCDs.
    Yes, I'm aware the node size is different.

    I find it interesting how AMD and Intel differ in how they break up the tiles.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Dustyboy1492 said:
    Lot's of real estate for NPU's that most people don't use.
    Most people don't use half of the features their system has...
    Also all the things on a CPU are there to make sales happen and if NPUs drive sales then job successfully done.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    The big question that has vaguely been answered, but hardly definitively, is that being the first 2nm class chip on the market, is it living up to what the technology was expected to provide? I am not even sure what smaller and denser is supposed to offer, can anyone elaborate on whether PTL is meeting those expectations?
    Reply
  • beyondlogic
    Notton said:
    If I did my math right...
    GPU die: 55.19mm²
    CPU die: 115.13mm²
    I/O die: 49.76mm²

    That GPU is quite small for its capabilities.

    On the other hand, Strix Halo is 307.58mm² for 40CU GPU + mem controller + I/O, and with 2x 67.02mm² CCDs.
    Yes, I'm aware the node size is different.

    I find it interesting how AMD and Intel differ in how they break up the tiles.

    That's good cause that will produce higher yields
    Reply