Wednesday, September 3rd 2025

NVIDIA Discrete GPU Market Share Dominance Expands to 94%, Notes Report

According to the latest report from analyst firm Jon Peddie Research, NVIDIA's discrete GPU market share has solidified its position in another area, now standing at the top with 94% of all AIB shipments in Q2 2025. This represents a 2.1% increase compared to the prior quarter, during which the company maintained an equally impressive share of ~92%. However, at the same time, AMD lost that 2.1% share, which suggests that all the AIB sales that AMD lost have been redirected to NVIDIA. The rollout of mid-range "Blackwell" GPUs has supported the gain of market share, now covering all budget tiers for every gamer. Meanwhile, AMD has only catered to the mid-range gamer with the RDNA 4 lineup, hence losing the possible high-end GPU purchase to NVIDIA.

While the rollouts of current GPU generations are now complete, we expect to hear more from Intel soon, which now holds a market share of less than 1% among AIBs. Overall, the AIB GPU market appears to be in a healthy state, with a notable rebound to 11.6 million units in Q2. Traditionally, the second quarter has seen lower seasonality, but this quarter's recorded GPU shipments were up from the 10-year average of 5.7%. An interesting tidbit from the report comes from Dr. Jon Peddie, president of Jon Peddie Research: "AIB prices dropped for midrange and entry-level, while high-end AIB prices increased, and most retail suppliers ran out of stock. This is very unusual for the second quarter. We think it is a continuation of higher prices expected due to the tariffs and buyers trying to get ahead of that."
The report also highlighted the situation with desktop CPU shipments, which increased 21.6% quarter-over-quarter, while decreasing 4.4% year-over-year. Additionally, the AIB attach rate, the percentage of desktop PCs sold with a separate graphics AIB, rather than relying on integrated graphics, increased to 154%, up 2.3% from the previous quarter.
Source: Jon Peddie Research
Add your own comment

237 Comments on NVIDIA Discrete GPU Market Share Dominance Expands to 94%, Notes Report

#1
Chomiq
Great, even closer to monopoly.
Posted on Reply
#2
Krit
ChomiqGreat, even closer to monopoly.
You literally stealed my words few seconds before! It will be interesting to see amd's reaction when it will be something like 97% nvidia's total one sided domination. AMD for last two generations are doing absolutely nothing to compete with nvidia just putting absurd prices on most new gpus by ignoring nvidia. Titanic is sinking but music still are playing iq level zero :kookoo:
Posted on Reply
#3
Apocalypsee
KritYou literally stealed my words few seconds before! It will be interesting to see amd's reaction when it will be something like 97% nvidia's total one sided domination. AMD for last two generations are doing absolutely nothing to compete with nvidia just putting absurd prices on most new gpus. Titanic is sinking but music still are playing iq level zero :kookoo:
They release matching prices to nvidia GPU without getting close to them in terms of feature nor performance, only RDNA4 cards are getting close to giving competitive performance and pricing, their RoCM7 is still on early preview stage (they supposed to release them last month) so this news isn't really surprising.
Posted on Reply
#4
Quicks
Only because AMD can't help but shoot themselves in the foot each and every release.
Posted on Reply
#5
Krit
QuicksOnly because AMD can't help but shoot themselves in the foot each and every release.
Something needs to be changed maybe sack from the work those idiots on the top. You can not ignore nvidia as a competitor and sell gpus for almost the same price it's like a slow cancer.
Posted on Reply
#6
INSTG8R
Vanguard Beta Tester
QuicksOnly because AMD can't help but shoot themselves in the foot each and every release.
I mean I am totally Team Red and I can't even come up with anything other than I totally agree, the amount of times they have just missed such obvious opportunities the last few years just leaves me shaking my head.
I'll give one simple one they had NO reason to miss. Releasing Startfield with FSR 2, Nope game had sailed, took on water, and they finally patched it in like it mattered at all at that point...
Posted on Reply
#7
Krit
INSTG8RI'll give one simple one they had NO reason to miss. Releasing Startfield with FSR 2, Nope game had sailed, took on water, and they finally patched it in like it mattered at all at that point...
Another would be GTA V very old game but it has FSR 4 support. Why not to release FSR4 on RDR and RDR2 it's really so hard to do ? People are waiting..... And this is the case for a lot of older games it's just ridiculous.
Posted on Reply
#8
RejZoR
QuicksOnly because AMD can't help but shoot themselves in the foot each and every release.
How? RX 9070 XT is really good. RX 9060 XT is really good. Yet people go to the shop and buy RTX 5060 8GB because RTX 5090 is the king of graphics so they need to have the RTX ON "experience". Nevermind the overkill over the top expensive RTX 5090 has nothing to do with shitcan they are buying, but that's the mentality of people. I've seen that before with Intel too during their worst Pentium 4 era.
Posted on Reply
#9
Chomiq
RejZoRHow? RX 9070 XT is really good.
It might be really good but they need aggressive pricing for it to sell really well. Instead they claim $600 MSRP but partner models go for over $700-800 in reality. When you reach that level it becomes an argument of "Well for $50 more you can have 5070 Ti that offers better upscaling, better RT support, etc." and AMD is no longer competitive. Only diehard AMD fans will buy the underdog because it is the underdog. Except AMD isn't really an underdog, it's a massive corporation that is loosing battle against Nvidia and needs to realize that year after year they have even less market presence in the GPU segment. They desperately need their Ryzen moment on the GPU front.
Posted on Reply
#10
Chrispy_
This is unsurprising.

The 9070XT may have been a sold-out success, but it's only one SKU and it's only been out for 5 months. Meanwhile, Nvidia's had four more months on the market, with a whole plethora of SKUs. The mainstream RDNA4 parts, (9060 series) only launched 50 days ago, whilst the competing 5070 and 5060Ti offerings have been out since March/April.

On top of that, Nvidia has LAPTOP sales too. AMD's 9000-series mobile chips don't even exist, and laptops outsell desktops by a WIDE margin.

AMD might have a good product in RDNA4, but since it's only sold to a tiny slice of the overall gaming market, it's no wonder that it's not appearing in the charts. Once again, AMD's engineers proving they have the chops to compete, but AMD's ability to actually execute and sell these things is abysmal.
Posted on Reply
#11
Krit
RejZoRHow? RX 9070 XT is really good. RX 9060 XT is really good.
Combination of poor pricing (from amd side) and nvidia green typical naiveness. Good is not enough at this stage it's little to late now it should be at least great not just good.

What do i mean by that?

RX 9070 XT 549$ msrp
RX 9070 499$ msrp
RX 9060 XT 16GB 299$ msrp

And i'm not talking about typical today's "fake" msrps!!!! And better pray and hope that nvidia will not lower their prices.

As good as RDNA 4 is right now it's just not enough the same but worse goes for Arc B580/B570
Posted on Reply
#12
OneMoreTurn
You know, 90% of the people who buy PCs are not able to make an informed choice. There are still people who mindlessly buy Intel CPUs because they think they are buying the state of the art.
Posted on Reply
#13
rattlehead99
KritSomething needs to be changed maybe fire from work those idiots on the top. You can not ignore nvidia as a competitor and sell gpus for almost the same price it's like a slow cancer.
When AMD had a better architecture and their smaller chips competed with Nvidia's bigger ones, and AMD sold for 40-66% of Nvidia's equivalent, people still in mass bought Nvidia, so what's the point?
Posted on Reply
#14
Dristun
RejZoRHow? RX 9070 XT is really good. RX 9060 XT is really good. Yet people go to the shop and buy RTX 5060 8GB because RTX 5090 is the king of graphics so they need to have the RTX ON "experience". Nevermind the overkill over the top expensive RTX 5090 has nothing to do with shitcan they are buying, but that's the mentality of people. I've seen that before with Intel too during their worst Pentium 4 era.
Being decent isn't good enough and even being better sometimes isn't good enough.
For example, Pentax at their peak competitive ~2010-2013 were selling cameras objectively better on every front than their direct APS-C enthusiast class competition and for less money too, and people, for various reasons (like massive investment into retail presence on Canon's part), still went with Canikons. While here AMD isn't killing their comp even in theory, instead it's almost there + slightly cheaper. Not gonna work!
Posted on Reply
#15
GeoffreyA
RejZoRHow? RX 9070 XT is really good. RX 9060 XT is really good. Yet people go to the shop and buy RTX 5060 8GB because RTX 5090 is the king of graphics so they need to have the RTX ON "experience". Nevermind the overkill over the top expensive RTX 5090 has nothing to do with shitcan they are buying, but that's the mentality of people. I've seen that before with Intel too during their worst Pentium 4 era.
It's extremely hard, if not impossible, to break the "GeForce mentality." It was like that 20 years ago and I'm surprised it still hasn't changed. If anything, it's worse.
Posted on Reply
#16
Krit
rattlehead99When AMD had a better architecture and their smaller chips competed with Nvidia's bigger ones, and AMD sold for 40-66% of Nvidia's equivalent, people still in mass bought Nvidia, so what's the point?
Stop it! On average gpu market share was 35-65 and now 6-94 it's a clear cancer wake up! What do you want to do wait until 3-97 ????????
Posted on Reply
#17
Imouto
AMD isn't shooting itself in the foot. Both AMD and Nvidia don't give a flying fuck about the discrete GPU market.

The only thing that could happen if AMD tried to be more competitive in the discrete GPU market is an uphill battle for the next 20 years hurting their quarterly results.
Posted on Reply
#18
INSTG8R
Vanguard Beta Tester
KritAnother would be GTA V very old game but it has FSR 4 support. Why not to release FSR4 on RDR and RDR2 it's really so hard to do ? People are waiting..... And this is the case for a lot of older games it's just ridiculous.
See that one didn't even cross my mine but just another L for AMD.. I even found a kinda wierd one yesterday. Jedi Outlaw "supports! FSR4 as it told when I launched the game., so I enabled it obviously yet in game only 3.1 is available unlike CP2077 once you enable FSR4 you can then select it in the game, just another swing and a miss. I even read the official FSR4 support page and yep Outlaws is on there...
Posted on Reply
#19
Dirt Chip
I see the 9700xx and 9600xx keep rocking it by the 100's of thousands...

What a crap of a market
Posted on Reply
#20
Aoyagi
RejZoRHow? RX 9070 XT is really good. RX 9060 XT is really good. Yet people go to the shop and buy RTX 5060 8GB because RTX 5090 is the king of graphics so they need to have the RTX ON "experience". Nevermind the overkill over the top expensive RTX 5090 has nothing to do with shitcan they are buying, but that's the mentality of people. I've seen that before with Intel too during their worst Pentium 4 era.
rattlehead99When AMD had a better architecture and their smaller chips competed with Nvidia's bigger ones, and AMD sold for 40-66% of Nvidia's equivalent, people still in mass bought Nvidia, so what's the point?
something something AdoredTV
Posted on Reply
#21
Space Lynx
Astronaut
amd 9070 xt still made them a profit and they sold out for quite awhile at msrp.

next gen xbox and ps6 will have amd fsr4 focus, and fsr4 will come to every main game in the future now cause of AMD console dominance.

amd may never be big in marketshare, but they are are still making profit, so i am not too worried about them exiting the market really. I think they will ahve a new FSR4 flagship within a year or two. and that's fine. it is troubling how dominant nvidia is though, thankfully the consoles and fsr4 will keep AMD alive, otherwise it would really suck.
Posted on Reply
#22
Woomack
Chrispy_This is unsurprising.

The 9070XT may have been a sold-out success, but it's only one SKU and it's only been out for 5 months. Meanwhile, Nvidia's had four more months on the market, with a whole plethora of SKUs. The mainstream RDNA4 parts, (9060 series) only launched 50 days ago, whilst the competing 5070 and 5060Ti offerings have been out since March/April.

On top of that, Nvidia has LAPTOP sales too. AMD's 9000-series mobile chips don't even exist, and laptops outsell desktops by a WIDE margin.

AMD might have a good product in RDNA4, but since it's only sold to a tiny slice of the overall gaming market, it's no wonder that it's not appearing in the charts. Once again, AMD's engineers proving they have the chops to compete, but AMD's ability to actually execute and sell these things is abysmal.
AMD failed the 9k premiere. Their cards were in store shelves on the first days of January (delivered still in December 2024), but they were not allowed to sell them before the premiere, which was delayed twice. So they lost at least two months. Nvidia had delays, too, but AMD could fill the gap with its products. They make the same mistakes each premiere or cause problems for manufacturers. I've heard numerous stories from motherboard and RAM brands about their issues with AMD over the last few years.
So, yes, the 9070XT was a success, but all other models didn't sell as well. The 9070 non-XT doesn't sell at all, unless there is a significant price drop. This is because they're priced not much lower than the XT. 8GB cards don't sell too, so the only other not bad model is the 9060XT 16GB, which was released a bit too late, and those who wanted something lower already got Nvidia or Intel (the B580 was selling great for some time).

As you said, AMD graphics in gaming laptops don't exist. I also don't think anyone considers their cards for professional work. They still have various issues with software and compatibility. Everything recommended for AI is Nvidia-based.

I'm not on any side, and I own AMD, Intel, and Nvidia. Each brand makes many mistakes. I use the 9070XT daily, and I feel it's a much better series than the last generations. I don't mean only the performance, but in general, better stability, power management, and noise. There are a lot of improvements, along with some minor ones, but overall, it still provides a better user experience.
Posted on Reply
#23
Krit
WoomackI use the 9070XT daily, and I feel it's a much better series than the last generations. I don't mean only the performance, but in general, better stability, power management, and noise. There are a lot of improvements, along with some minor ones, but overall, it still provides a better user experience.
RX 9070 XT is the same or slightly better than RX 7800 XT rock solid no issues with drivers/stability. Well at least finally AMD have better stability than nvidia...
Posted on Reply
#24
Unregistered
ChomiqGreat, even closer to monopoly.
"...A natural monopoly is a market structure where one company can supply the entire market at a lower average cost than multiple competing firms."
#25
mb194dc
This is just more NVDA pumping isn't it... What's the source of the data? and more importantly, how much Nvidia stock are they holding?

It's directly contradicted by the steam hardware survey which shows AMD gaining market share?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 1st, 2026 10:24 CDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts