Friday, April 17th 2026

ASRock Develops HUDIMM Memory Standard: DDR5 with Just One Sub-channel

You know we've hit rock-bottom with memory affordability when ASRock innovates a new memory standard to lower prices. The new "HUDIMM," or half unbuffered DIMM, is an ASRock-innovated standard. It calls for UDIMMs with half a rank of memory, populating just one of the two 40-bit sub-channels. Such a DIMM would only offer half its bandwidth even at its rated memory clock, and of course half the density. The HUDIMM standard is targeted at entry-level builds and business desktops that just want a modern platform for everyday tasks, and something to tide over the DDR5 memory crunch. ASRock partnered with Team Group to manufacture the first HUDIMM memory modules, which it tested to work on its Intel 600-series, 700-series, and 800-series chipset motherboards. HUDIMM support probably requires some UEFI firmware-level awareness of the standard, and ASRock is expected to release firmware updates for the same.

Here's the fun part—ASRock made it possible for end-users to pair HUDIMMs with regular UDIMMs that have two 40-bit sub-channels; for example, pairing an 8 GB HUDIMM with a 16 GB UDIMM, to achieve asymmetric capacities such as 24 GB, and the bandwidth of at least 3 DDR5 sub-channels. ASRock also developed HSODIMM, which—you guessed it—is a DDR5 SO-DIMM with just one sub-channel. Team Group will manufacture these HSODIMMs, and ASRock's Deskmini series mini-PCs that are based on MoD (mobile on desktop) platforms, will implement support for them. ASRock is perfectly faced to address the client computing market during the DDR5 famine; besides the HUDIMM/HSODIMM innovation, the company is developing a new crop of Socket LGA1700 motherboards with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory slots.
Add your own comment

105 Comments on ASRock Develops HUDIMM Memory Standard: DDR5 with Just One Sub-channel

#1
Mrgravia
I'm reminded of the Netbooks that came up in the early 00's when we were facing a major economic downturn. Suddenly a cheap, "good enough for the basics" mini laptop was an interesting buy.

This obviously isn't geared toward any sort of enthusiast user, but could be nice for folks who just need one for the basic of basics.

Also the Deskmini is a fun little platform for basic users. The X600/USB4 on the AMD side is awesome for the $159 or so it retails for these days.
Posted on Reply
#2
kondamin
This is going to be used by system integrators and the systems running them will perform very poorly.

This shouldn’t have been invented
Posted on Reply
#3
wNotyarD
And people were calling the ressurgence of DDR4 platforms a sad concept.
Posted on Reply
#4
jesdals
I can almost see the complaints from people buying these sticks thinking its normal UDIMMS - dont hope its gives a flood of scam sales
Posted on Reply
#5
Dr. Dro
This is a bird brained idea, and must be rejected by the market at all costs. The performance will be dismal, cast it back to the asynchronous dram grave it was dug out of
Posted on Reply
#6
ir_cow
You might has well get 8GB of DDR4 for the same performance.
Posted on Reply
#7
Bigshrimp
Who doesn't love downgraded technology in their PCs? This idea needs to be cast back into the dark pit it came from.
Posted on Reply
#8
Dr. Dro
ir_cowYou might has well get 8GB of DDR4 for the same performance.
Should be better, since latencies are much lower and the channel width is twice as large... this is just a preposterous failure, especially at the lower end segment they're attempting to cater to

33000MB/s at 90ns with 3 subchannels at 4800... what cretin thought this was a good idea
Posted on Reply
#9
bonehead123
Well, as a wise man once said:

"Stupid is as stupid does", hahahaha :D
Posted on Reply
#10
LastDudeALive
kondaminThis is going to be used by system integrators and the systems running them will perform very poorly.

This shouldn’t have been invented
"Perform poorly" in what? I work in corporate IT, every single micro-PC we have is only used to check email and open a spreadsheet once a shift to enter some numbers. If this means we can get them for cheaper, huzzah. This obviously is not going to be used in the much rarer workstations with high-end CPUs and discrete GPUs and 64GB+ of RAM.
Posted on Reply
#11
Wirko
I hereby invent the ZUDIMM. It comes with no memory chips. You mount them yourself if you can find at least one, and can afford it. Some soldering and SPD programming experience recommended. Mixing brands not recommended.
Posted on Reply
#12
Sol_Badguy
You know we've hit rock-bottom with memory affordability when ASRock innovates a new memory standard to lower prices. The new "HUDIMM," or half unbuffered DIMM, is an ASRock-innovated standard.
You know what would actually be awesome?
ASRock innovating motherboards that don't kill Ryzen CPUs. *mic drop*
Posted on Reply
#13
kondamin
LastDudeALive"Perform poorly" in what? I work in corporate IT, every single micro-PC we have is only used to check email and open a spreadsheet once a shift to enter some numbers. If this means we can get them for cheaper, huzzah. This obviously is not going to be used in the much rarer workstations with high-end CPUs and discrete GPUs and 64GB+ of RAM.
Far cheaper to get something intel n series with soldered ram.
Posted on Reply
#15
R-T-B
kondaminFar cheaper to get something intel n series with soldered ram.
Yeah, I was on the fence but thats actually an excellent point. This is kind of useless with those running around.
Posted on Reply
#16
A Computer Guy
kondaminThis is going to be used by system integrators and the systems running them will perform very poorly.

This shouldn’t have been invented
I hope the ram sticks are labeled properly. Confusion incoming for the used market once those trickle down.

Sorry this just popped into my mind after reading the article. For Star Trek fans that may be lurking...


UDIMM - A full blooded vigorous and agile Klingon warrior ready to do battle at any time, any application, any game.
HUDIMM - An enslaved retrofitted humanoid assimilating your computing spaces until only a slow mediocre AI hivemind remains.
Posted on Reply
#17
ir_cow
A Computer GuyI hope the ram sticks are labeled properly. Confusion incoming for the used market once those trickle down.

Sorry this just popped into my mind after reading the article.
Im petty sure it will only work on ASRock MBs with BIOS support. When it comes out i'll buy a stick and see if it boots anywhere else. I have my doubts.
Posted on Reply
#18
A Computer Guy
With all that extra space on the module ASRock totally missed an opportunity to insert RGB.
Dr. DroShould be better, since latencies are much lower and the channel width is twice as large... this is just a preposterous failure, especially at the lower end segment they're attempting to cater to

33000MB/s at 90ns with 3 subchannels at 4800... what cretin thought this was a good idea
Interesting you should mention latency. I just finished watching this interesting videoregarding memory latency before I saw this TPU post.
Posted on Reply
#19
Harun8
Very cool tech, just wish this would make $50 ram and not $150 ram
Posted on Reply
#20
Evrsr
This is not very different from 1Rx16, which already has performance issues of it's own.

Unfortunately most people move from 1DPC Gaming PC to another one when it gets too slow. They perpetually live with bad specs without knowing.
Posted on Reply
#21
crusty_laptop
asrock always makes weird motherboards and abandons them and the tech after a few generations
Posted on Reply
#22
Wirko
kondaminFar cheaper to get something intel n series with soldered ram.
And you don't have to worry about the possibility of getting 32-bit memory in that PC.
A Computer GuyInteresting you should mention latency. I just finished watching this interesting videoregarding memory latency before I saw this TPU post.
One effect of a narrower bus is longer latency because a burst transfer of 64 bytes will take 8 clock cycles instead of 4 (in a single-channel setup) or 2 (dual-channel).
Posted on Reply
#23
remixedcat
cats n kittens we have the QLC of the RAM world.
Posted on Reply
#24
DeltaHawk001
Well, I'd prefer more dual DDR4/DDR5 motherboards, but this seems .... good I think??
Posted on Reply
#25
Apocalypsee
Oh no please don't. I kept using my DDR4 system thanks.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 1st, 2026 11:25 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts