GreatWyrmGab

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
yawnwhatyadoing
hellenhighwater

image

Well those are allllmost done

codebreakerblue

question. why do you have 7 featureless grey monoliths in your driveway

hellenhighwater

There's eight actually but the last one is still in the garage

jackfromthefairytale

question. why do you have eight featureless grey monoliths

hellenhighwater

They're actually a really dark purple

fishofthewoods

question. why do you have seven featureless really dark purple monoliths in your driveway and an eighth in the garage

hellenhighwater

Some of them do have features though. There's holes and hinges and stuff, so I can put secrets in em

nobodywasneverhere

question. why do you have 8 really dark purple occasionally featureful monoliths

hellenhighwater

The heart wants what the heart wants

fred-the-dinosaur

this reads like a muppet sketch

fred-the-dinosaur

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

see? See!??!

hellenhighwater

You're not wrong

hellenhighwater

image

This post is less than six months old.

kailan-sunshine

I love all of it

greatwyrmgold

It’s more than six months old now.

tumblr relic tumblr
heyitschartic

Anonymous asked:

goddess and bonesaw roleswap au

heyitschartic answered:

HOLD UP OKAY okay okay head over my hands taking deep breaths thinking about this.

A young Goddess taking on Bonesaw’s role is just so shockingly perfect as a fit. Jack probably wasn’t involved in her trigger this time, but found her somewhere along the way and swept her into the Nine. She almost immediately took on a role as some kind of apprentice to him (he only managed to not be mastered by his power messing with her thoughts on the matter.) She leans into her new role and learns fast, where Bonesaw can’t seem to get it right. Jack hates how easy her master power makes it to acquire new members, but loves the fucked up things she can make people do with it. Combined with her danger sense and TK, she can do some absolutely brutal and terrifying things.

But, Goddess has bigger ambitions than playing second fiddle and she doesn’t really like Jack the some way Riley does, though she plays at it. He rubs her the wrong way, makes her think of the people that made her trigger, though she does latch onto Siberian. Jack knows there’s a sword hanging over his head in every single interaction between the two, but he loves it, the tightrope of playing with her and seeing how far he can push her before she tries everything.

At some point things will blow up and she and Shatterbird will head off to make that #Girlsquad, but that’s years down the line.

An older Riley as Goddess is SO interesting. I see for her a pattern of harassment, getting her powers and doing something unconscionable, then being pushed into a corner and having to do it again and again. If we keep the cluster for her, I think it’s all but guaranteed Bill pushes her to do something so fucked up she convinces herself anything she does in response is righteous. At some point Cauldron sees the path she’s heading down and intervenes to put her somewhere more containable.

They also make sure to drop her somewhere she’s pressed to fight and that the ball will just keep rolling. Shin is already a world falling apart and a young Riley, with this need to do good, falls into a Taylor framework. She convinces herself it’s for a better cause and keeps doing worse and worse things: converting capes, making monsters, biological weapons.

Despite this she still manages to get people behind her, and when she starts taking over places she brings it all down. Riley craves that human connection, it’s central to her character, and in a world where she can’t seem to do anything right, she’ll instead build a world where she can. It’s a fucked up Kingdom, maybe likeable to something Nilbog might do if he cared about humans more, but it’s hers and she’s happy to be its queen.

Essentially though, she just makes the world of Twig. This fucked up society of body horror and bio punk, just with a bit more actual tech mixed in there.

Though she’s helping out with those parahuman research facilities from the get go; can’t let the scientists steal all the fun.

parahumans worm au bonesaw roleswap
artbyblastweave

smoke-in-the-wind asked:

I know dc has sort of already tried this a few times, but if you were to create an Ultimate Universe (the early 00s one) style interpretation of the DC universe, which characters would you deconstruct (like hulk or hank pym) and which would you reconstruct (like spider-man)?

artbyblastweave answered:

I’m not sure who, if anyone, I’d take to the woodshed in the way they did Bruce and Hank. But in a more positive direction, I think Ultimate Superman writes itself.

One thing that the Original Ultimate Universe caught basically infinite shit for was that Spider-Man was the only likeable hero out of the entire roster- everyone else was a jingoistic government stooge, a sellout, an ineffective moron, a vindictive moron, or involved in whatever label you want to stick on the clusterfuck that was the Ultimate X-Men. Certain commentators treated this as something that happened by accident- like somehow Spider-Man was the only character to slip through a net- but this was actually a very deliberate thematic and political choice. The early Ultimate Universe in particular was undergirded by a running theme of the ways in which the heroes were compromised and made dirty by having to exist in a world that was remotely politically realistic. Captain America was unexamined in his patriotism in the way that a guy unpaused direct from the end of world war 2 would realistically be; likewise the celebrity and proximity to power of the classic Avengers lineup was characterized as insidious and complicit in the crimes of the Bush Administration even as they embark on flashier superheroic exploits. The Fantastic Four’s dimension-trotting adventures were explicitly underwritten by their work building new ways for the Military to kill people in the Middle East (paraphrasing a direct quote.) The X-Men were a hotbed of moral compromise, seediness and occasional bouts of ethically-dubious psychic-assisted ass-covering, with the repeated drumbeat from multiple writers that they were letting their own narrative about being feared and hated overwrite their awareness of how their entire enterprise was a complete circus- itself a metatextual commentary on the out-of-universe observation on the fact that, for all they bloviate about being oppressed, a significant chunk of their lineup consists of cishet white people with supermodel good looks:

image

As shown here, a consequence of all this is that Spider-Man, despite not changing much in his characterization from Baseline Peter, came out looking like a paragon. His early-career anger and sense of put-upon-ness is significantly more justified in this continuity because the entire world actually is out to get him; he got his powers through gross negligence by a military industrial complex contractor, he spends his time constantly beating the crap out of more of their runoff, and American Intelligence is circling him like a hawk waiting for an opportunity to headhunt him and sicc him on their enemies. Bendis narratively tied this to his youth; he’s able to be a hero in the classic mold because the world hasn’t dragged him down yet. The forces arrayed against him, of which there are many, haven’t found a way to pin him down and make him sell out. Everybody is expecting him to sell out. Kingpin has a whole speech about it; Jameson’s hatred of him is expressly tied to the fact that he lives in a world where skepticism of good intentions is generally pretty justified. But Peter remains, fundamentally, an outsider- in a way that feels contrived in mainline Marvel but incredibly well-earned in this context- right up until the forces aligned against him actually do get him killed. Accounting for comic book time, poor bastard only lasted a couple years before the bottom fell out and his lifestyle caught up with him. Only the good die young.

image

So. Superman. The parallels here are obvious, right? Superman, like Spider-Man, wants to do classic Superhero Shit. He’s not overtly political and he isn’t ambitious. He wants to go out and save people, he wants to stop people who’re trying to hurt people from hurting people. He’s the nicest guy in the world and he can eat guns and it’s almost impossible to make him do something he thinks is the wrong thing to do. But if you live in a world remotely like ours, having that level of power and using it to go out and help people and save people means that you fall somewhere on the scale between weirdo and enemy of the state, and the bad guys you have to stop from hurting people work for the duly elected government, or they run the economy, and the guns you have to eat belong to the cops and the military as often as they do bank robbers in white striped shirts. Putting a nice guy who wants to do the right thing into a setting with a remotely appropriately cynical outlook on politics is basically an instant deconstruction without you having to do anything extra to the hero himself, it’s like throwing a sodium bomb into a bathtub.

This sequence from Batman vs Superman is one of my favorite pieces of superhero media that exists, and any Ultimate-style spin on the character would be extrapolated directly from this. The Snyder take gets some flak for taking itself too seriously, being too dark, yadda yadda yadda, but Superman himself is very pointedly not the site of any of that darkness. Superman is just Superman. He spends this whole sequence doing Classic Superman Shit- no violence whatsoever, just rescues- and the talking heads won’t stop picking him apart, looking for the angle, looking for the catch, looking for a lever to get him under control. Tyson trying to make him into some kind of existential harbinger of Man’s insignificance in the universe, juxtaposed against a mother in a flood zone crying tears of joy because God didn’t send boats or a helicopter but spraypainting Superman’s logo on the roof actually paid off. Lex wants him dead in this version mainly because a guy this powerful being this nice makes him insecure.

What really sells this for me is that Clark is visibly aware of, and deeply uncomfortable with, the immense impact he’s having on everyone- he’s asking all the same questions about the implications of his own existence as the talking heads. He doesn’t know either! But there are still people in burning buildings and flood zones. Someone’s gotta do something, and he’s someone, and he can do anything. And he is, of course, dead by the end of the movie.

greatwyrmgold

If I was an making Ultimate DC Universe…well, I’d probably need to do a lot of research into Regular DC first. But one crucial difference between Spider-Man and Superman is—and bear with me for a moment—power level.

Spider-Man is generally framed as an underdog. Sure, he can stop trains bare-handed and jump up skyscrapers and bench-press a jumbo jet, but he consistently fights supervillains who are even stronger than that, or who have powers that hard-counter his spider-powers. He can’t just punch his way out of problems; he almost always has to use his head, find some weakness or clever trick.

Superman isn’t averse to using weaknesses or clever tricks, but quite often, he doesn’t have to. He’s generally treated as the most powerful guy on Earth. Most of his famous supervillains are either physically weak masterminds like Lex Luthor (whose schemes can’t be countered by Superman’s powers, until he puts on a robot suit) or apocalyptic monsters. Doomsday is strong enough that Superman doesn’t need to hold back against him, and that parity is terrifying enough that people call him Doomsday.

Peter Parker in Marvel’s Ultimate Universe is a little guy who can choose to be a cog in the system, or fight it and get crushed. When he takes a bullet to protect someone, he bleeds.

But Clark Kent isn’t an everyman superhero; he’s the superhero. The archetype, the paragon, the gold standard. When he takes a bullet, he has to make sure it doesn’t ricochet into a civilian. He can’t fight the good fight until “his lifestyle catches up with him”; he’s faster than a speeding bullet, the lifestyle isn’t.

Which isn’t to say he’s omnipotent. If Lex Luthor never puts on a robot suit, Superman’s powers can’t counter any of his schemes. In the socioeconomic or political arena, Superman is at best a celebrity. He can punch tanks, but if Lex Luthor gets elected president and makes himself a dictator, Superman is less capable than Tom Cruise. What’s he going to do? Punch cops and soldiers until they let him be dictator?

If Ultimate Spider-Man is a story about an earnest superhero who can’t survive in a politically-cynical world, Ultimate Superman should be a story about an earnest superhero who can survive a politically-cynical world, but can’t change it. Or at least who struggles to change it, despite his immense strength.

part of this is just me thinking it's more interesting if Ultimate DC tells a different story than Ultimate Marvel and looking for a good point you could use to distinguish one from the other superman spiderman compare and contrast yes-anding mostly

I’ve been reading Witch Watch for a while, so of course I watched the anime. It reminded me how much the status quo has changed since chapter 1.

One thing that hasn’t changed is that some of the jokes are really hard to translate.

image
image
image
image
image

So, if you’re familiar enough with Japanese culture, you might catch “Momota” and “pheasant” and figure out that it’s a reference to the folk tale about Momotaro, a peach-boy who beat a bunch of oni after befriending a dog (inu), monkey (saru), and pheasant (kiji).

But if you’re not? Four dudes shout random names, and the fifth dude wonders why the fourth one isn’t a pheasant. That’s it.

It’s handled a little more gracefully in the manga, but that’s not a fair comparison. Anime doesn’t have margins where a translator can stick a little explanatory note.

image

Well, I guess you can cram in a little explanatory note, but that usually looks silly.

image

It adds clutter, it’s stuck in a time-locked medium, and this kind of note just isn’t a very good substitute for the cultural context that the original joke relies on.

This joke is followed by a second joke referencing a different Japanese folk tale (I have no idea which one), and we’re barely more than a minute into the first episode.

It’s a confusing first impression for weebs insufficiently familiar with Japanese culture, and I’m not sure I can say it’s an incorrect impression. There are multiple chapters centered around a little magical pastry guy who speaks in Japanese bread-name puns.

witch watch translation localization anime
thydungeongal
maidthings

I think tumblr should preserve the following/mutuals badge on anons. It'd make the website worse but in a really good way. it should be applied retroactively too

greatwyrmgold

You could send weird anon asks to your mutuals without worrying that they might think you’re weird for sending them, or stressing them out about what could be perceived as anon harassment.

On the other hand, you could get weird anon-mutual asks and worry about annoying a mutual if you ignore them.

tumblr yes-anding