Russian military satellite closes from 200 miles to 3 miles of US radar satellite aiding Ukraine — astronomer says it may be the first unapproved rendezvous in low Earth orbit

Rendering of an ICEYE radar satellite in orbit above Earth
(Image credit: ICEYE)
15

A Russian military satellite, Cosmos 2612, has closed to roughly 3 miles, from a previous distance of more than 200 miles, of the U.S.-owned radar satellite that operates in a fleet that supports Ukraine, Axios reports. The unapproved rendezvous in low Earth orbit, which astronomer Jonathan McDowell says may be the first of its kind, raises alarm in the West. The position change, which was likely not an accident as fuel is scarce, is probably a provocation and an attempt to spy on the satellite.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Shane Downing
Contributing Writer

Shane Downing is a Contributing Writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering consumer storage, PC hardware, and AI.

  • PEnns
    Very strange sentences in this article:

    "....The unapproved rendezvous in low Earth orbit", "The approach was made without the owner’s consent"
    So what happens if the Russians ignore the "owner's" approval, i.e being at 3 miles distance instead of 6 miles)? Are there laws and consequences in Low Earth orbit??
    Reply
  • cknobman
    Oh no they are breaking space etiquette, LOL.
    Reply
  • artk2219
    cknobman said:
    Oh no they are breaking space etiquette, LOL.
    More like setting themselves up for a nice "accident" after they have learned whatever they wanted. The collision and break up from those two satellites would screw up orbits for years, it wouldn't be ideal.
    Reply
  • skaurus
    Oh no, they approached our satellite, the one we use to help the country they’re at war with, to carry out strikes inside their territory. How rude and unwarranted /s
    Reply
  • helper800
    skaurus said:
    Oh no, they approached our satellite, the one we use to help the country they’re at war with, to carry out strikes inside their territory. How rude and unwarranted /s
    If country A starts a war with country B, and country B is backed by country C, it would be odd that country A is making aggressive moves towards country C. Country A better be careful as to not start a war with country C too.
    Reply
  • artk2219
    helper800 said:
    If country A starts a war with country B, and country B is backed by country C, it would be odd that country A is making aggressive moves towards country C. Country A better be careful as to not start a war with country C too.
    Normally, yes. But not as likely with the orange moron on a string and his merry band of muppets running country c.
    Reply
  • skaurus
    helper800 said:
    If country A starts a war with country B, and country B is backed by country C, it would be odd that country A is making aggressive moves towards country C. Country A better be careful as to not start a war with country C too.
    It also would be odd for country C to act surprised by repercussions of their actions.
    Reply
  • helper800
    artk2219 said:
    Normally, yes. But not as likely with the orange moron on a string and his marry band of muppets running country c.
    :LOL:
    Reply
  • helper800
    skaurus said:
    It also would be odd for country C to act surprised by repercussions of their actions.
    The pot calling the kettle black, ladies and gentlemen.
    Reply
  • call101010
    shoot it down ?
    Reply