You should be Cardinal Tedescomaxxing.
>Pro Tridentine Mass
>Pro ethnic segregation/ethnic Churches
>Pro Latin
>Anti Liberal
>Wants an Italian Pope
>Wants to expose Simony and corruption
>Anti religious relativism
>Pro Re-Migration
Note well, that “Ecumenism” doesn’t have to be shameful and humanistic, a clear example of my style of ecumenism was Pius 9th inviting the Orthodox Bishops to come and help mediate Vatican 1, had the Eastern Bishops accepted Vatican 1 could have come out differently.
>Be Pius V
>Is pro Holy war and against religious liberty
>Tell English Catholics to engage Holy War and revolt contra religious liberty
>V2 is contra Holy War and pro Religious Liberty
>Be Guilty of both affirming Holy War and denying religious liberty
>Dies and goes to Hell
Entirely depends on whether one accepts that religious liberty is true.
A liberal would have to say that Pius V has blood on his hands for telling the English Catholics to revolt against religious liberty.
Vatican 2’s ecumenism was unfruitful with Protestants but fruitful with the Orthodox.
The Vatican should leave the Protestants behind as stubborn schismos with no chance of surviving what is coming, only with Unity with the East is there real hope.
Orthodox people who think that Ireland used to be a haven of Orthodoxy should decide for themselves whether they think Abbotts should rule the Church or Bishops… As such was the practice of Celtic Heterodoxy.