Anthropic's latest AI model identifies 'thousands of zero-day vulnerabilities' in 'every major operating system and every major web browser' — Claude Mythos Preview sparks race to fix critical bugs, some unpatched for decades

Anthropic
(Image credit: Anthropic, AMD)
9

The capabilities of AI coding agents like Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex are already causing seismic shifts for the software industry, but if Anthropic's latest disclosure is to believed, even more disruption is in the pipe. In a new blog post today, the frontier lab behind Claude revealed that its latest model, Claude Mythos Preview, is so capable at teasing out bugs that it's found "thousands of high-severity vulnerabilities, including some in every major operating system and web browser."

Given Claude Mythos Preview's potentially disruptive and wide-ranging capabilities, Anthropic isn't simply releasing it to the world, consequences be damned. Instead, the lab has convened key players across the software and hardware industries in order to use Mythos's bug-finding prowess to proactively patch the vulnerabilities it exposes before other frontier AI labs are able to deploy models of similar capabilities without similar guardrails.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jeffrey Kampman
Senior Analyst, Graphics

As the Senior Analyst, Graphics at Tom's Hardware, Jeff Kampman covers everything that has to do with graphics cards, gaming performance, and more. From integrated graphics processors to discrete graphics cards to the hyperscale installations powering our AI future, if it's got a GPU in it, Jeff is on it. 

  • LordVile
    How much of these actually work and how many are so contrived they’d never be actually useable?
    Reply
  • alan.campbell99
    Have they got another investment round pending?
    Reply
  • TechieTwo
    If only 80% are real/executable it would not be a surprise at all and typical of piss poor code.

    t992ul_IKtcView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t992ul_IKtc
    Reply
  • Bigshrimp
    I have to wonder if it also will create new ones? Nothing is infallible, especially something machine made, that was made by man. I mean really?
    Reply
  • Darkhands
    Is this what the US was after when they wanted to work with Anthropic, and why they went so ballistic when they were turned down?

    Having exclusive access to those kind of exploits would provide a huge advantage to their black hat guys.
    Reply
  • Why_Me
    Darkhands said:
    Is this what the US was after when they wanted to work with Anthropic, and why they went so ballistic when they were turned down?

    Having exclusive access to those kind of exploits would provide a huge advantage to their black hat guys.
    https://economistwritingeveryday.com/2026/04/07/oops-anthropic-accidently-leaked-the-entire-code-for-its-claude-code-program/
    Reply
  • bit_user
    LordVile said:
    How much of these actually work and how many are so contrived they’d never be actually useable?
    Based on my experience with CoPilot, this is the vast majority of issues it finds. It'll raise issues on potentially insecure coding practices, but the thing it's complaining about isn't practically exploitable, in any meaningful sense. Haven't used Claude, but I expect it's mostly similar.

    I will say that Copilot has found real bugs, which is why I put up with all the nonsense issues it raises. I haven't yet used it to write code, but my co-workers have and I've generally not been impressed by the results.
    Reply
  • pjmelect
    I wonder if they are making money by claiming bug bounty?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    pjmelect said:
    I wonder if they are making money by claiming bug bounty?
    Do bug bounties even still exist, in this age of AI coding bots?

    If they do, then I'd expect the bar is fairly high, such as like showing that the bug is actually exploitable. Probably not worth their while. They want the big bucks that will come from putting more programmers out of work.
    Reply