Windows 11 24H2 may block connections to unsecured third-party NAS devices — Microsoft enables SMB signing for enhanced security

Windows 11's GUI
(Image credit: Microsoft)
17

Microsoft's principal program manager, Ned Pyle, addressed new security changes with Windows 11 24H2 via the Microsoft blog. The changes will deny access to unsecured routers with USB ports and some Network Attached Storage devices. Pyle mentions that the upcoming upgrade abandons the much earlier variants of the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol and hence the potential issue.

Pyle explains that SMB1 is over forty years old, and warnings of its demise have been echoed since 2022. The Windows 11 24H2 takes one step forward, as it requires SMB signing by default, which will avoid tampering on the network. Guest fallback will be disabled on Windows 11 Pro Edition, which provides better security as it allows access to an SMB server without a username or password. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Roshan Ashraf Shaikh
Contributing Writer

Roshan Ashraf Shaikh has been in the Indian PC hardware community since the early 2000s and has been building PCs, contributing to many Indian tech forums, & blogs. He operated Hardware BBQ for 11 years and wrote news for eTeknix & TweakTown before joining Tom's Hardware team. Besides tech, he is interested in fighting games, movies, anime, and mechanical watches.

  • ezst036
    How will this affect using a computer that has been brought out from the basement (previously used, now collecting dust) and reformatted/re-commissioned as a linux-based NAS?

    These old Core 2s and first gen Zen computers make great personal servers(print, data, music, etc).

    Not everybody will just be going out and buying some retail NAS around here.

    EDIT: Made the text bigger for the part people keep missing or choosing to ignore.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    ezst036 said:
    How will this affect using a computer that has been brought out from the basement (previously used, now collecting dust) and reformatted/re-commissioned as a linux-based NAS?

    These old Core 2s and first gen Zen computers make great personal servers(print, data, music, etc).

    Not everybody will just be going out and buying some retail NAS around here.
    Probably will just need an update to whatever OS it is running.

    An old protocol going away is not a new or unique thing.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    USAFRet said:
    An old protocol going away is not a new or unique thing.

    Agree.
    Reply
  • coromonadalix
    and what do you do when the nas maker doesn't upgrade it's nas Os ????...
    Reply
  • brandonjclark
    For those wondering how this will affect them, here are a few things I can think of...


    SMB Signing doesn't require certificates, rather it uses hashes.
    Signing adds a small amount of new data requirement (the signing exchange process data {key, session data}) to each block.
    This will REDUCE performance, especially if you are logging your SMB transactions.
    Have fun updating your old devices (OS's) or disable this new SMB requirement.*
    Can anyone find fault with these statements?


    PowerShell
    #get status of SMB Signing
    Get-SmbClientConfiguration | select RequireSecuritySignature

    #disable SMB Signing
    Set-SmbClientConfiguration -RequireSecuritySignature $false

    #get status of guest fallback
    Get-SmbClientConfiguration | select EnableInsecureGuestLogons

    #enable guest fallback
    Set-SmbClientConfiguration -EnableInsecureGuestLogons $true
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    coromonadalix said:
    and what do you do when the nas maker doesn't upgrade it's nas Os ????...
    Cross that bridge when you come to it.

    My QNAP is currently over 7 years old (Jan 2017)
    It gets updates regularly...like every 4-6 weeks.
    Reply
  • Katana.lx
    Admin said:
    To boost security for its users, Microsoft has disabled SMB1 and Guest Signing protocol by default, securing billions of Windows 11 24H2 PCs as it would not allow access to unsecured NAS devices, prompting the respective manufacturers to enable it.

    Windows 11 24H2 may block connections to unsecured third-party NAS devices — Microsoft enables SMB signing for enhanced security : Read more
    Dear Mr Roshan Ashraf Shaikh,

    I'm sorry but what you describe happens for a while in Windows 10. I don't know in wich update that happened but every time I make a new installation in Windows 10, I have to install manually the SMB 1.1 services. I have a D-LINK NAS enclosure (DNS-323) and I cannot reach it in Windows or Linux Mint without installing manually the services (in the case of Mint you have to change a file) for quite some time.
    Windows 11 was behind Windows 10 in this case.

    Dinis Domingos
    Reply
  • ravewulf
    One potential wrinkle is for retro computer hobbyists who want to transfer files between a modern computer or NAS and their older Windows 9x/Windows XP systems
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    ravewulf said:
    One potential wrinkle is for retro computer hobbyists who want to transfer files between a modern computer or NAS and their older Windows 9x/Windows XP systems
    If it fails, sneakernet.
    Reply
  • derekullo
    Years ago at work I setup a Xigmanas NAS using SMB1 that any computer on our network could read from for the purposes of installing software using psexec. (The share is write protected by default unless I need to add files)

    Before Windows 11 all computers were able to access the NAS without issue.
    With Windows 11 Enterprise I had to update the nas protocol to SMB3 and add the following script to the beginning of my update script.

    net use Z: \\ServerName\ShareName /user:genericx genericxpassword /persistent:no (not the real username or pass :p)

    So that windows wouldn't give the error of can't connect to an unsecured NAS or something like that.

    I guess this makes it more secure, but if that's all it takes is a malicious user to create a generic account to connect to their malicious NAS I don't see any security in that.

    Will SMB signing require more steps than this to access the NAS or is using SMB3 all that is needed?
    Reply