Skip to content

Migration section for Joomla 7.0#589

Open
Hackwar wants to merge 3 commits intojoomla:mainfrom
Hackwar:7.0
Open

Migration section for Joomla 7.0#589
Hackwar wants to merge 3 commits intojoomla:mainfrom
Hackwar:7.0

Conversation

@Hackwar
Copy link
Member

@Hackwar Hackwar commented Feb 28, 2026

Migration section for Joomla 7.0

@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Contributor

Review Summary by Qodo

Add Joomla 6.4 to 7.0 migration documentation stubs

📝 Documentation

Grey Divider

Walkthroughs

Description
• Add migration documentation stubs for Joomla 6.4 to 7.0 upgrade
• Create new features, deprecations, and compatibility plugin guides
• Include developer notes about unreleased version status
Diagram
flowchart LR
  A["Migration 6.4-7.0"] --> B["New Features"]
  A --> C["New Deprecations"]
  A --> D["Compatibility Plugin"]
  B --> E["Feature Documentation"]
  C --> F["Deprecation Guide"]
  D --> G["Plugin Migration Guide"]
Loading

Grey Divider

File Changes

1. migrations/64-70/index.md 📝 Documentation +10/-0

Main migration index for 6.4 to 7.0

• Create main index page for Joomla 6.4 to 7.0 migration guide
• Set sidebar position and title metadata
• Provide overview of upgrade notes structure

migrations/64-70/index.md


2. migrations/64-70/new-features.md 📝 Documentation +13/-0

New features guide for Joomla 7.0

• Add new features documentation page for Joomla 7.0
• Include developer note about unreleased version status
• Provide placeholder for feature documentation and best practices

migrations/64-70/new-features.md


3. migrations/64-70/new-deprecations.md 📝 Documentation +16/-0

New deprecations guide for Joomla 7.0

• Create deprecations documentation page for Joomla 7.0
• Add developer note about unreleased version
• Include reader note indicating no deprecations introduced yet

migrations/64-70/new-deprecations.md



4. migrations/64-70/compat-plugin.md 📝 Documentation +28/-0

Compatibility plugin migration guide

• Document compatibility plugin changes from Joomla 6.0 to 7.0
• Explain replacement of old plugin with "Behaviour - Backward Compatibility 7"
• Include warnings about behaviour plugin type and reference to 6.0 documentation
• Add developer notes about unreleased version status

migrations/64-70/compat-plugin.md


Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Contributor

qodo-code-review bot commented Feb 28, 2026

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (2) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Grey Divider


Action required

1. Wrong index frontmatter🐞 Bug ✓ Correctness
Description
The 6.4→7.0 migration index page has frontmatter copied from the 6.0→6.1 page (wrong title and
duplicate sidebar_position), so it will be mislabeled in the sidebar and may be ordered
unpredictably. The frontmatter title also contradicts the page H1, creating user confusion.
Code

migrations/64-70/index.md[R2-3]

+sidebar_position: 989
+title: 6.0 to 6.1
Evidence
The new 64-70 index declares the same title and sidebar_position as the existing 60-61 index, but
the H1 indicates it is for 6.4→7.0; this is a direct inconsistency and will surface in
navigation/metadata. The surrounding version indices use a descending sidebar_position sequence
(e.g., 990 then 989), indicating 64-70 should not reuse 989.

migrations/64-70/index.md[1-10]
migrations/60-61/index.md[1-10]
migrations/54-60/index.md[1-4]

Agent prompt
The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
`migrations/64-70/index.md` has incorrect frontmatter copied from `migrations/60-61/index.md` (`title: 6.0 to 6.1` and `sidebar_position: 989`). This mislabels the 6.4→7.0 migration docs in the sidebar and duplicates the ordering value used by the 6.0→6.1 section.
## Issue Context
Other migration indices use a descending `sidebar_position` sequence (e.g., 54-60 is 990, 60-61 is 989). The 64-70 page H1 already states “Joomla 6.4 to 7.0 Upgrade Notes”, so the frontmatter should align with that.
## Fix Focus Areas
- migrations/64-70/index.md[1-4]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools


2. Wrong deprecations version🐞 Bug ✓ Correctness
Description
The 6.4→7.0 “New Deprecations” page incorrectly says Joomla 6.1 has no deprecations yet, which is
inconsistent with this section and can mislead readers. This appears to be copied from the 6.0→6.1
deprecations page without updating the version reference.
Code

migrations/64-70/new-deprecations.md[R14-16]

+:::tip[Reader Note]
+  No deprecations have been introduced in Joomla 6.1 yet
+:::
Evidence
The new 64-70 deprecations page explicitly mentions Joomla 6.1, while it is intended for the 6.4→7.0
migration section. The exact same sentence exists in the 60-61 deprecations page, indicating a
copy/paste that was not updated for the new section.

migrations/64-70/new-deprecations.md[8-16]
migrations/60-61/new-deprecations.md[8-16]

Agent prompt
The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
`migrations/64-70/new-deprecations.md` contains a reader note claiming no deprecations have been introduced in Joomla 6.1 yet. This is inconsistent with the 6.4→7.0 migration section and is likely a copy/paste error.
## Issue Context
The same sentence appears in the 6.0→6.1 migration docs where it makes sense. For 6.4→7.0, the note should either mention Joomla 7.0 (if accurate) or be removed until confirmed.
## Fix Focus Areas
- migrations/64-70/new-deprecations.md[14-16]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools


Grey Divider

ⓘ The new review experience is currently in Beta. Learn more

Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

### Detailed documentation

:::warning[Reader Note]
Please read the [Compatibility Plugin 6.0](../54-60/compat-plugin.md) section
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wronge path

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants