User talk:Magitroopa

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 60 days are automatically archived 2 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 10.

I'm just trying to figure out what your note about my recent edit means. The infobox template doesn't tell me anything. As for the information I changed, the theme song changes for season 17, not 18. All-Stars did not use "Fire". Roger Craig Smith only narrated a couple seasons, with Jason Thompson handling the rest of them. Starbeam2 (talk) 18:38, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

All those infobox parameters such as 'presenter', 'starring', 'judges', 'voices', 'announcer', or in this case, 'narrator'/'narrated', should not have anything such as years or seasons included in the infobox, only in whatever prose text. In this case, mentioning the years or seasons whoever has narrated the show would be fine to mention at Hell's Kitchen (American TV series)#Cast, if not already mentioned there.

It was previously mentioned in the template's parameter table, but as it now states within the bullets above the parameter table, "Do not add additional text, such as years, seasons, or individual episodes, that explains when a person was part of the show". Hope this clears it up. Magitroopa (talk) 18:47, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate the explanation. I'll still change the theme song thing, but only to remove the year span as you said. Starbeam2 (talk) 13:42, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the changes I made today, I can add them to the other tables if it will make the edits more consistent. Starbeam2 (talk) 21:54, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the † sign I added to Petrozza in season 4? This sign is used in season 2 multiple deceased contestants and in season 3 Aaron. ~2026-10563-85 (talk) 11:27, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The ones in those articles have now been removed as well. As I previously stated, WP:NOTAMEMORIAL is the reasoning. We are not going to go around every single article adding a little symbol to memorialize every single person who has died, otherwise you'll just end up seeing that symbol next to every single name however many years from now. This is not the place to add a 'tribute' to them just because they have passed away. Aside from that, the claim(s) that they have died is unsourced anyways.

Now please stop adding these in- they will continue to be reverted/removed, and if you continue adding them in anyways, it will likely need to be reported. If you really feel the need to memorialize them, please do so elsewhere, but Wikipedia is not the place for this. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 15:16, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable, as long as the rest are removed I'm fine with that ~2026-10563-85 (talk) 22:32, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep undoing all of my edits? MaxHogan25 (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained in my edit summaries- for example, removing hidden notes like you keep doing on South Park is not helpful in the slightest. Magitroopa (talk) 18:11, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually trying to make corrections to the pages I was editing. MaxHogan25 (talk) 22:58, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

As you keep deleting my edits to this particular page, claiming too far in advance, I was wondering how many days in advance of the episode airing would YOU add tables? In this particular table, the episode airs in two days. Thenchick (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In all honesty, we don't need an empty (for the most part) table sitting idly on the article if there's nothing yet note worthy to include in it (contestants for the episode are already listed in that respective table). This season, they've actually been posting on social media however many hours in advance on the day-of-airing of the song lists for the episode (for example, last week's episode), so once that is up/posted is likely when it's best to get it added in the article.

Also noting that adding 'Star Trek Royale' should probably wait until we know during the airing of the episode. Despite the royale element being used in recent weeks/episodes, assuming that it will be appearing in this episode/without any reliable source(s) would be original research, also that we don't know how they will title the royale element for the respective episode. Thanks. Magitroopa (talk) 19:16, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Should we put Happy Tree Friends as 2000-present instead of ending at 2016 since it got revived? MaxHogan25 (talk) 13:52, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read MOS:TVNATIONALITY and stop with these kinds of edits- it literally says to include the show's nationality if singular, don't include it if it's more than one: that means don't put 'American-Canadian', 'American-Australian', etc. into articles. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 16:36, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I included one nationality this time. MaxHogan25 (talk) 16:49, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The main article says it is both American and Canadian, so no nationality should be included at all in that case. Magitroopa (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! MaxHogan25 (talk) 17:05, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I added a hidden note. MaxHogan25 (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I just wanted to politely request that next time you revert an edit like this, please provide a slightly more clear edit summary. Other talk pages such as this one and this one have "reference ideas" sections, so I'm assuming you didn't mean "talk pages should not have reference ideas sections." I'm assuming you meant, "Further reading items should not be moved to a reference ideas section", but I'm not entirely sure, based on your edit summary.

To explain my edit, I recently saw an editor in an FA review talking about how Further Reading sections are not ideal for high quality articles. Since I had been putting unused references in the Further Reading section during my editing of the SpongeBob page, I realized those unused references would be more appropriate in a suggested list on the talk page. Of course, you didn't know any of that background, so I'm not taking issue with your edit. I just wanted to explain my edit, and check in to see if there's any problem with having a reference ideas section on the SpongeBob talk page, even if we don't move anything from Further Reading over there. Please let me know your thoughts, and have a good day. OrdinaryOtter (talk) 16:48, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think like how it is done on Talk:Princess Leia would be the 'correct' way of doing it, if anything. SpongeBob SquarePants/references was deleted per WP:G7 (One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page) which seemingly in-turn, had Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants/references deleted per WP:G8 (Talk page of deleted page) I don't know if there are other articles using this format (feel free to let me know if there are), but I'd imagine there would be a possibility of Talk:Spider-Man (2002 film)/references being deleted at some point as well, since there is no corresponding page at Spider-Man (2002 film)/references (also under WP:G8- "Talk pages with no corresponding subject page" / "Subpages with no parent page"). Magitroopa (talk) 18:03, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. The only other page I know that uses the format is this one. Would you like me to convert that one and the Spider-Man one to the Princess Leia format? OrdinaryOtter (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Magitroopa. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

• You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
• Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

• When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
• Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
• Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:15, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Should we add Let's Sing 2026 to the Let's Sing page? MaxHogan25 (talk) 14:30, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello the reason I changed season 4 of Next Level Chef to that color was because things were started up for that season I picked the color. I know it was a while ago but I had not been there in so long I did not know it was changed. MattJr4793 (talk) 06:06, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to change colors 'just because you picked it'- they should actually be based upon something, which in this case, is the red 'E' in 'Level' in the show's logo. Please see MOS:TVCOLOR for more information, thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 06:08, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well dang that is just sad but whatever I get it thanks anyway. LOL MattJr4793 (talk) 06:14, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.newspapers.com/search/results/?date=1965-04-02&keyword=match+game+&publication-ids=7802

https://www.newspapers.com/search/results/?date=1965-04-05&keyword=match+game+&publication-ids=7802

See how it is now listed as a color show on April 5, 1965? Loyalist2024 (talk) 21:25, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. How's your day going? I have a question regarding the Floor episode dilemma. If we delete the episode summaries (Game scores not included), would that lift the ban? Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 21:16, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]