Integrated Food Security Phase Classification

The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), also known as IPC scale, is a tool for improving food security analysis and decision-making. It is a standardised scale that integrates food security, nutrition and livelihood information into a statement about the nature and severity of a crisis and implications for strategic response.^[1]

The IPC was originally developed in 2004 for use in Somalia by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization's Food Security Analysis Unit (FSAU).^[2] Several national governments and international agencies, including CARE International, European Commission Joint Research Centre (EC JRC), Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), USAID/FEWS NET, Oxfam GB, Save the Children UK/US, and United Nations World Food Programme (WFP), have been working together to adapt it to other food security contexts.^[1][3][4]

The work of the IPC's Famine Review Committee is funded by development aid programs from the EU, the UK, Canada, and Germany.^[5] The Famine Review Committee is composed of international experts who are not affiliated with national governments or local political interests. Its mandate is to conduct analyses based solely on technical and scientific criteria.^[6]

The following IPC reference tables list the general profiles of the elements for each phase or level respectively for the three IPC unintegrated classification scales, which together constitute the IPC "big picture" classification scale:^[1][4]

		IPC severity phase 1 None/Minimal[i]	IPC severity phase 2 Stressed[ii]	IPC severity phase 3 Crisis[iii]	IPC severity phase 4 Emergency[iv]	IPC severity phase 5 Catastrophe/Famine[v]
First-level outcome	Food consumption (focus on energy intake)	Adequate	Minimally adequate	Moderately adequate	Very inadequate	Extremely inadequate
	Livelihood change (assets and strategies)	Sustainable	Stressed	Accelerated depletion	Extreme depletion	Near collapse of strategies and assets
Second-level outcome	Nutritional status	Minimal	Alert	Serious	Critical	Extremely critical
	Mortality	CDR: <0.5 / 10,000 / day	CDR <0.5 / 10,000 / day	CDR <0.5 - 0.99 / 10,000 / day	CDR <1 - 1.99 / 10,000 / day	CDR >2 / 10,000 / day
Contributing factors	Food availability, access utilization and stability	Adequate	Borderline adequate	Inadequate	Very adequate	Extremely adequate
	Hazards and vulnerability	None or minimal effects	Stressed livelihoods and food consumption	Results in assets and food losses	Results in large food assets and food losses	Results in near complete collapse of livelihood assets

This article is missing information about IPC reference tables. Please expand the article to include this informationto include this information or by making an edit request. Further details may exist on the talk page. (February 2026)

This article is missing information about IPC reference tables. Please expand the article to include this informationto include this information or by making an edit request. Further details may exist on the talk page. (February 2026)

The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) has been used in several countries to assess and respond to food insecurity, each presenting unique challenges and responses.

In Ethiopia, the 2021 IPC analysis highlighted a severe food insecurity crisis, with over 5.5 million people in Tigray, Amhara, and Afar facing high levels of acute food insecurity due to conflict, displacement, and disrupted markets. As of May 2021, approximately 3.1 million were in Crisis (IPC Phase 3), 2.1 million were in Emergency (IPC Phase 4) and 353,000 were experiencing Catastrophe (IPC Phase 5).^[7]

In Sudan, the April–May 2024 IPC analysis indicated severe food insecurity, with 25.6 million people facing Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or worse. A total of 8.5 million are facing Emergency (IPC Phase 4), and 755,000 people Catastrophe (IPC Phase 5). Key factors include ongoing conflict and limited humanitarian access, particularly in Greater Darfur and Kordofan regions. The analysis warns of possible famine if conditions deteriorate, particularly for displaced populations and refugees in conflict-affected areas.^[8]

The July–December 2024 IPC analysis for the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) indicates severe food insecurity affecting 25.6 million people, categorized as Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or worse. Among them, 3.1 million face Emergency (IPC Phase 4) conditions, particularly in conflict-impacted provinces like North Kivu, Ituri, and South Kivu. Projected conditions from January to June 2025 suggest similar challenges due to ongoing armed conflict, economic instability, and high food prices. Displaced populations remain especially vulnerable.^[9]

The IPC scale has been used to monitor the humanitarian crisis in Gaza since the beginning of the Gaza war in October 2023. According to the impact snapshot published on 30 July 2025 by the UN office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), 100% of the population is projected to face acute levels of food insecurity classified in IPC Phase 3 or above, including one million facing Phase 4 and 470,000 facing Phase 5.^[10] This is significantly worsened since the September–October 2024 IPC report, when 1.84 million people were facing Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or worse conditions, but only 6 percent of Gazans face IPC Phase 5 food insecurity, which was the lowest figure reported since the start of the famine.^[11] Israel placed Gaza under total siege during March and April 2025, and was forced to allow in minimal food under increasing pressure from the international community, but mass starvation continues to worsen.^[12] Famine was confirmed and projected to expand by IPC as of 15 August 2025 with a third of the population expected to face IPC Phase 5 famine, 58 percent facing IPC Phase 4 emergency, and 20 percent facing IPC Phase 3 crisis.^[13] It is the first time that the IPC has recorded a famine outside of Africa.^[14]

As of July–September 2024, an estimated 4.4 million people in Somalia are experiencing high levels of acute food insecurity (IPC Phase 3 or above), with around 1.6 million children likely to suffer from acute malnutrition. While recent rainfall improved agricultural conditions, localized floods and ongoing conflict still hinder food access and agricultural production. Despite these challenges, there is a slight improvement from the previous year. The IPC's projections for October–December 2024 suggest ongoing needs for humanitarian assistance, particularly for vulnerable populations in crisis and emergency phase.^[15]

The latest IPC analysis for Yemen, covering July 2024 to February 2025, highlights severe food insecurity affecting nearly half of the population in government-controlled areas. From July to September 2024, about 4.7 million people faced Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or Emergency (IPC Phase 4) levels of food insecurity. The economic decline, persistent conflict, and irregular humanitarian aid remain key drivers of food insecurity, worsened by recent floods in August 2024. A marginal improvement is anticipated, but humanitarian aid is crucial to prevent further deterioration.^[16]

The challenges of the IPC scale include data quality issues, particularly in conflict zones or areas with limited access for data collection. This often leads to reliance on available but sometimes unreliable data. There are also challenges with subjective interpretation, as expert judgment is required in cases where data is sparse or inconsistent. Furthermore, the IPC's reliance on evidence convergence means that contradictory data can arise, complicating consensus-building and analysis.^[17]

• Famine scales
• Global Acute Malnutrition

• Website of the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification
• Integrated Food Security and Humanitarian Phase Classification: Technical Manual (Version 3.1)