Had an interesting conversation with Andrew Hill at the Financial Times about one of the questions I get asked most: will AI reduce opportunities for young people starting their careers? I think that's the wrong question. The real question is how AI changes what early careers should look like. Rather than eliminating junior roles, it has the potential to make them far more valuable. Used well, AI can help junior employees learn faster by making institutional knowledge more accessible, while giving senior people more time to mentor and focus on work that requires human judgement. Hiring certainly hasn't slowed at Luminance. If anything, seeing talented young people equipped with the right AI tools has reinforced how quickly they can contribute and grow. AI shouldn't replace early-career talent, it should help develop and elevate it. I shared more of my thoughts in this Financial Times piece on how AI is reshaping entry-level work - https://lnkd.in/em8Yg4ZR
Many thanks for joining and helping shape the fascinating conversations I had on this topic Eleanor Lightbody
Really thoughtful perspective. As someone early in my career, I’m excited by how AI can help us learn faster and contribute more from the start.
I agree with you, Eleanor—but unfortunately, big corporations driven by Wall Street pressures often move in the opposite direction. Yes, AI tools help automate many tasks; I recently automated tasks my team couldn't complete for over 3 years in just 3 days! However, that doesn't mean we don't need programmers—there is still so much to build and improve. Yes, young graduates as well as persons with disabilities and carers who cannot contribute long hours can be trained and given opportunities which were not possible in traditional business, with work from home or hybrid models easily. 🚀💡