About
Experience & Education
Patents
Other similar profiles
Explore more posts
-
Daniel Coviello
Things to ponder: This is exactly the right question to be asking. Most orgs assume controls degrade gracefully under pressure. In reality, many silently fail open. Tabletop scoring around fail-closed vs fail-open behavior, evidence generation, and operator decision paths is one of the fastest ways to surface hidden risk. Availability matters. But integrity under stress is what determines blast radius.
-
Jared Sanborn 🧠
Anthropic is cutting off Claude access for OpenClaw and every third-party agent harness today at 3pm ET. Let that sink in. You're paying for a subscription with Claude. You built workflows around it. You trusted the access would stay. And now... the rug got pulled. Same tokens. Same subscription. But if you're routing through anything that isn't Anthropic's own tools? Blocked. HackerNews is on fire. Bloomberg picked it up. The word "bait and switch" is trending for a reason. Here's what nobody is saying though. This was always going to happen. You were renting capacity through a loophole. The moment the platform decided those tokens were worth more served internally, your setup was done. This is the real problem with building on rented AI access. You don't own anything. You don't control anything. One policy change at 3pm on a Friday and your entire workflow breaks. There's another way. At PureBrain.ai, your AI is born. Named. Lives in its own dedicated container. It doesn't share capacity with anyone. No throttling. No surprise policy changes. No "we decided your tokens belong to us now." Predictable pricing. Permanent access. Your AI partner, not a subscription you're hoping doesn't change terms overnight. If OpenClaw was your setup... this is your sign. What's your move now that the rug got pulled? Full story: https://lnkd.in/eE6BCd3E Further reference: https://lnkd.in/eq7RtwfP. #AI #OpenClaw #PureBrain #AgenticAI #AutomateEverything
14 Comments -
Derek E. Baird, M.Ed.
𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗮 𝗣𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁-𝗼𝗳-𝗜𝘁𝘀-𝗞𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲-𝗟𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹 𝗔𝗴𝗲 𝗩𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗟𝗮𝘄. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗘𝗱𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗞𝗶𝗱𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵 𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗡𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗞𝗻𝗼𝘄 Governor Newsom signed AB 1043 this week, and it's a game-changer for how platforms handle minor user data. Unlike similar laws in Texas and Utah that were quickly challenged in court, California worked directly with tech companies to design a constitutionally defensible framework. The key differences: • Verification at the OS level (Apple, Google, Microsoft), NOT the app store. • Covers ALL computing devices, not just mobile. • No parental consent required for downloads. • No photo ID uploads, avoiding the privacy backlash that plagued the UK's Online Safety Act. • Creates "deemed knowledge" so developers can't claim they didn't know users were minors. The 𝗹𝗮𝘄 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗝𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝟭, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟳, with operating systems required to be 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗯𝘆 𝗝𝘂𝗹𝘆 𝟭, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟳. Tech giants backed it. Hollywood opposed it. If you're building apps for kids, this law fundamentally changes your compliance obligations. I've broken down what it means, how it differs from Texas/Utah laws, and what you need to do to prepare. https://lnkd.in/grNBjRHd
1 Comment
Explore top content on LinkedIn
Find curated posts and insights for relevant topics all in one place.
View top content