Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Oct 21:16:1621768.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1621768. eCollection 2025.

Effectiveness of artificial intelligence chatbots on mental health & well-being in college students: a rapid systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Effectiveness of artificial intelligence chatbots on mental health & well-being in college students: a rapid systematic review

Shahzadhi Nyakhar et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Mental health disorders among college students have surged in recent years, exacerbated by barriers such as stigma, cost associated with treatment, and limited access to mental health providers. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven chatbots have emerged as scalable, stigma-free tools to deliver evidence-based mental health support, yet their efficacy specifically for college populations remains underexplored.

Objective: This systematic rapid review evaluates the effectiveness of chatbots in improving mental health outcomes (e.g., anxiety, depression) and well-being among college students while identifying key design features and implementation barriers.

Methods: Four databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, Applied Science & Technology Source, ACM Digital Library) were searched for studies published between 2014 and 2024. Two reviewers independently screened articles using predefined PICO criteria, extracted data and assessed quality via the PEDro scale. Included studies focused on chatbot interventions targeting DSM-5-defined mental health conditions or well-being in college students.

Results: Nine studies (n=1,082 participants) were included, with eight reported statistically significant improvements in anxiety (e.g., GAD-7 reductions), depression (e.g., PHQ-9 scores), or well-being. Effective chatbots frequently incorporated cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), daily interactions, and cultural personalization (e.g., 22% depression reduction with Woebot; p<0.05). However, heterogeneity in study quality (PEDro scores: 1-7), high attrition rates (up to 61%), and reliance on self-reported outcomes limited generalizability.

Conclusions: Though the use of chatbots for the improvement of mental health and well-being is promising based on the review's results, future research should prioritize rigorous RCTs, standardized outcome measures (e.g., PHQ-9, GAD-7), and strategies to improve attrition.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; chatbot; college students; conversational agent; mental health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram. PRISMA flow diagram (20).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Utilization of assessment tools to measure chatbot effectiveness for mental health.

References

    1. American College Health Association . American college health association-national college health assessment II: reference group executive summary spring 2018(2018). Available online at: https://www.acha.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/NCHA-II_Spring_2018_Refe... (Accessed April 3, 2025).
    1. Fulmer R, Joerin A, Gentile B, Lakerink L, Rauws M. Using psychological artificial intelligence (Tess) to relieve symptoms of depression and anxiety: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Health. (2018) 5:e64. doi: 10.2196/mental.9782, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chirikov I, Soria KM, Horgos B, Jones-White D. Undergraduate and graduate students’ mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Berkeley, California: Center for Studies in Higher Education; (2020). Available online at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/80k5d5hw (Accessed April 3, 2025).
    1. Hu K, Godfrey K, Li Q. The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in USA: Two years later. Psychiatry Res. (2022) 315:114685. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114685, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ebert DD, Mortier P, Kaehlke F, Bruffaerts R, Baumeister H, Auerbach RP, et al. Barriers of mental health treatment utilization among first-year college students: First cross-national results from the WHO World Mental Health International College Student Initiative. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. (2019) 28:e1782. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1782, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources