Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;64(1):e12844.
doi: 10.1111/bjso.12844.

World-making for a future with sentient AI

Janet V T Pauketat  1 , Ali Ladak  1   2 , Jacy Reese Anthis  1   3   4
Affiliations

World-making for a future with sentient AI

Janet V T Pauketat et al. Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

The ways people imagine possible futures with artificial intelligence (AI) affects future world-making-how the future is produced through cultural propagation, design, engineering, policy, and social interaction-yet there has been little empirical study of everyday people's expectations for AI futures. We addressed this by analysing two waves (2021 and 2023) of USA nationally representative data from the Artificial Intelligence, Morality, and Sentience (AIMS) survey on the public's forecasts about an imagined future world with widespread AI sentience (total N = 2401). Average responses to six forecasts (exploiting AI labour, treating AI cruelly, using AI research subjects, AI welfare, AI rights advocacy, AI unhappiness reduction) showed mixed expectations for humanity's future with AI. Regressions of these forecasts on demographics such as age, the year the data was collected, individual psychological differences (the tendency to anthropomorphise, mind perception, techno-animist beliefs), and attitudes towards current AI (perceived threat and policy support) found significant effects on all forecasts from mind perception, anthropomorphism, and political orientation, and on five forecasts from techno-animism. The realized future that comes to pass will depend on these dynamic social psychological factors, consequent changes in expectations, and how those expectations shape acts of world-making.

Keywords: AI rights social movement; anthropomorphism; forecasting; moral circle expansion; techno‐animism; theory of mind; world‐making.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Agerström, J., & Björklund, F. (2013). Why people with an eye toward the future are more moral: The role of abstract thinking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(4), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.803967
    1. Anthis, J. R., & Paez, E. (2021). Moral circle expansion: A promising strategy to impact the far future. Futures, 130, 102756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102756
    1. Axtell, B., & Munteanu, C. (2021). Tea, earl grey, hot: Designing speech interactions from the imagined ideal of Star Trek. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445640
    1. Badaan, V., Jost, J. T., Fernando, J., & Kashima, Y. (2020). Imagining better societies: A social psychological framework for the study of utopian thinking and collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(4), e12525. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12525
    1. Banks, I. M. (1987). The culture. Orbit Books.

LinkOut - more resources