Forecasting Research Institute × LEAP

About

About LEAP

The Project

The Longitudinal Expert AI Panel (LEAP) is a three-year project tracking the views of leading computer scientists, industry professionals, policy researchers, and economists on the trajectory of artificial intelligence. LEAP aims to create the most reliable map of the future of AI and its impacts.

Every month, LEAP participants provide thousands of forecasts across recurring and one-shot questions, leveraging the science of judgmental forecasting to provide deep insights amidst rapid technological change. These forecasts form the basis of monthly reports that synthesize expert consensus and disagreement, highlight emerging trends, and track the evolving landscape of AI progress.

This initiative aims to provide decision-makers in government, industry, and civil society with near-term, resolvable forecasts to inform policy, strategy, and risk management in an era of rapid technological change. With an informed view of short-term forecasting accuracy, LEAP can provide clarity to the debate on the long-run impacts of artificial intelligence.

LEAP Reports

Explore the monthly wave reports, built from expert forecasts, charting shifting expectations and the contours of the AI debate.

Browse the reports

The Panel

LEAP consists of AI experts, forecasters with a demonstrated track record of accuracy on forecasting tasks (“superforecasters”), and the members of the general public. Across the first three waves of LEAP we received responses from:

  • 339 experts across computer science, economics, industry, and policy
  • 60 highly accurate forecasters (“superforecasters”), based on prior geopolitical forecasting tournaments
  • 1,400 members of the public, largely consisting of especially engaged participants in previous research, reweighted to be nationally representative of the U.S.

We describe our panel and sampling procedure in greater detail in the “Panel Construction” section of the LEAP whitepaper.

Expert Sampling

LEAP targets prominent experts who policymakers, business and nonprofit leaders, and other stakeholders would be most inclined to consult regarding the progression of AI capabilities and its technological impact. Specifically, we include four expert communities.

  1. We invite computer scientists researching topics in AI by including top-cited authors, stratified by age, and the authors of the top-rated papers at leading AI and ML conferences.
  2. We include industry professionals, identified via their contributions to frontier models or employment at AI-related companies with extensive fundraising.
  3. We identify leading economists, both across fields and within the subfield of economics focused on measuring the economic effects of AI and new technology. We include top-cited authors of papers on AI and technology, members of the US Economic Experts Panel (Clark Centre Forum 2025), and attendees of economics conferences on AI.
  4. We identify research staff at think tanks and other institutions leading the discussion on AI development, policy, and impacts.

For more information on our sampling frame, see Appendix A of the LEAP whitepaper.

To better characterize these experts, our respondent sample includes:

  • Top computer scientists. 41 of our 76 computer science experts (54%) are professors, and 30 of these 41 (73%) are from top-20 institutions (according to CSRankings.org). 23 (30%) had top-rated (top-40 or better) papers at NeurIPS or ICLR in recent years, and eight others (11%) are PhD students or postdocs who are highly cited according to our criteria. Ten (13%) are among the 200 top-cited authors in AI (according to OpenAlex). This category also includes researchers at academic and non-academic research institutions. Our CS respondents have a median of 7,100 citations (for the 95% of panelists for whom data is available).
  • AI industry experts. 20 of our 76 industry respondents (26%) work for one of five leading AI companies: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta, and Nvidia. 21 of the remaining industry respondents (28% of the total) work for either a top AI company (top-20 model providers, by training compute, as measured by EpochAI), were identified as contributors to top-15 LLMs according to training compute on Epoch or performance on Chatbot Arena, or work for one of the top-30 (by fundraising) AI-related companies (according to Crunchbase). The remaining respondents were recategorized from our CS literature sampling pools, referral sampling, or other categories. Our industry respondents have a median of 9,100 citations (for the 59% of panelists for whom data is available).
  • Top AI economists. 54 of our 68 economist respondents (79%) are professors, and 30 (44%) are from top-50 economics institutions (according to RePEc). Our economist respondents have a median of 2,200 citations (for the 96% of panelists for whom data is available).
  • Policy and think tank group. Of our 119 AI policy respondents, 75 (60%) work for the following most-represented organizations (unordered): Brookings, RAND, Epoch AI, Federation of American Scientists, Center for Security and Emerging Technology, AI Now, Carnegie Endowment, Foundation for American Innovation, Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence and other related groups, GovAI, Institute for AI Policy and Strategy, Future of Life Institute, Institute for Law & AI, Center for a New American Security, Data & Society Research Institute, Abundance Institute, and the Centre for International Governance Innovation.
  • TIME 100. Our panel includes 12 honorees from TIME’s 100 Most Influential People in AI in 2023 and 2024. TIME 100 honorees are categorized by their expertise and distributed among the above categories.

Our Team

Ezra Karger photo

Ezra Karger

Principal Investigator

Ezra is a senior economist in the research group at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, where he constructs high-frequency indices that track policy-relevant economic indicators and develops methods for forecasting long-run, low-probability, and unresolvable questions. Ezra co-founded and is the Director of Research at the Forecasting Research Institute. He was previously an accurate research subject in IARPA’s ACE, HFC, and FOCUS forecasting tournaments.
Website
Tatsunori Hashimoto photo

Tatsunori Hashimoto

Principal Investigator

Tatsunori is currently an assistant professor of computer science at Stanford University. His research uses tools from statistics to make machine learning systems more robust and trustworthy — especially in complex systems such as large language models. The goal of his research is to use robustness and worst-case performance as a lens to understand and make progress on several fundamental challenges in machine learning and natural language processing.
Website
Josh Rosenberg photo

Josh Rosenberg

Executive Director

Josh oversees a variety of research, strategy, fundraising, and operations work at FRI, and he is particularly focused on making forecasting more useful to decision-makers. Previously, he was a Senior Advisor and Senior Research Manager at GiveWell, where he spent several years working in management, research, grantmaking, and hiring.
Website
Zack Devlin-Foltz photo

Zack Devlin-Foltz

Research Manager

Zack has experience using a range of methods to inform decisions, especially in international development. Before FRI, he worked at IDinsight, leading and advising teams who informed decision-makers in Senegal, Morocco, Nigeria, and elsewhere. He also led IDinsight’s work on value-of-information modeling, which often incorporated judgmental forecasting. He is especially passionate about developing methods with decision-relevance in mind.
Website
Jordan Canedy photo

Jordan Canedy

Senior Researcher

Jordan is a researcher with a background in computational mathematics and product management. He is interested in applying rigorous scientific methods to improve decision-making for high-stakes, societally impactful issues.
Website
Matt Reynolds photo

Matt Reynolds

Director of Communications

Matt works on increasing the impact and visibility of FRI's work, helping it reach the media, decision-makers, and future partners. Before joining FRI, he was a senior writer at WIRED and a technology reporter at New Scientist.
Website
Zach Jacobs photo

Zach Jacobs

Data Analyst

Zach is a data analyst who, since 2019, has been working with Professor Tetlock and others at the University of Pennsylvania on various forecasting research projects.
Website
Nadja Flechner photo

Nadja Flechner

Data Analyst

Nadja is a data analyst with a background in AI research. Before joining FRI, she worked on weather forecasting, climate modelling and technical AI research. At FRI, she primarily researches and develops AI tools to assist research tasks.
Website
Rhiannon Britt photo

Rhiannon Britt

Data Analyst

Rhiannon is a data analyst with a statistics background. She began her career conducting impact evaluations for small UK charities, helping them understand and quantify their effectiveness. After some time in the UK civil service, forecasting the impact of transport and safety interventions, she is now most interested in translating data-driven insights into actionable strategy.
Website
Victoria Schmidt photo

Victoria Schmidt

Research Operations Analyst

Victoria is a research operations analyst with a background in inorganic chemistry. She is deeply interested in how forecasting can help with anchoring major decisions to reality, particularly in the policy space. At FRI, Victoria improves and manages research processes across projects.
Website

We greatly appreciate the assistance and input of Alexa Pan (Emeritus), Amory Bennett, Cathy Buffington, Charlie Rogers-Smith (Emeritus), Christina Aguila, Connacher Murphy (Emeritus), Dan Mayland, David Mathers, Morgane Bascle, and Tim Francis throughout the project.

Research Partners

Forecasting Research Institute Logo

Forecasting Research Institute

Forecasting Research Institute (FRI) develops forecasting methods to improve decision-making on high-stakes issues. First-generation forecasting research—spearheaded by FRI Chief Scientist Philip Tetlock and coauthors—focused on establishing a rigorous standard for prediction accuracy. The next generation of work aims to channel this approach into real-world relevance by applying the latest forecasting methods to topics such as AI progress, pandemics, and nuclear risk.

The FRI team conceptualized and designed the Longitudinal Expert AI Panel (LEAP) and is responsible for the day-to-day running of the project.

Learn more
Princeton Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence Logo

Princeton AI Lab

The Princeton Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence (PLAI) is an initiative designed to support and expand the scope of AI research at Princeton. The AI Lab focuses on areas where rapid advances in AI can yield disproportionate academic impact, complementing Princeton’s broad intellectual strengths.

PLAI helps with the recruitment of experts to LEAP and the distribution of results.

Learn more

Funders

LEAP is supported by grants from Coefficient Giving and Craig Falls.

FRI’s funders exercise no editorial control or influence over our research methodology, findings, or conclusions.