Time for a Proper Pinned Post (PPP)!

image
image
image

My name is Jinx. You can call me that or Cosmo. Any pronouns. I am not as old and crotchety as I act, but I’m still a full-grown adult.

I am first and foremost a songwriter, and you can listen to my songs right here on Tumblr or elsewhere on the internet.

If you like my music, want to support my top-surgery dreams, or are simply feeling generous, you can donate to my ko-fi.

Some other words that describe me: music nerd, language lover, accidental philosopher, avid autodidact, professional translator, writer for love, (former) editor for money, feminist, queer, kink-positive, neurodivergent. I’m pretty anachronistic.

Some of my favorite tags I often use on this blog can be found attached to this post. Enjoy!

EDIT: If Tumblr goes down, you’ll be able to find me on Dreamwidth and probably also on Pillowfort. Feel free to add me there pre-emptively any time, just in case.

(also: I’m the leftist-socialist-anarchist type. Free Palestine, BLM, ACAB, FCK NZS, FCK AFD, you get the idea. Not a fan of TERFs or Zionists. I have no DNI.)

transhuman-priestess:

aromanticbastards:

transcyberism:

transhuman-priestess:

transhuman-priestess:

transhuman-priestess:

The more I read into reports about industrial and transportation accidents the less I feel like “operator error” actually exists

Ok so “doesn’t exist” may be a slight overstatement. A better way of phrasing it might be “operator error is often used as a way of warding off close examination of how systems fail.”

You read about airlines accidents attributed to pilot error, and almost universally you find overworked, overtired people who have to deal with inadequate training, and poorly maintained equipment. Often investigations uncover a pattern of management ignoring problems that pilots regularly have to deal with. Out-of-date terrain data, false sensor readings, confusing systems presentation, fatigue.

The cargo airline industry fights to keep its pilots exempt from crew rest requirements and a fatigued crew crashes a mile short of the runway. Only the two crew on board die, so really it’s no big deal, right?

Amtrak builds a new bypass to cut 10 minutes off the travel time from Portland to Seattle but doesn’t give the engineers enough training to prepare them for it, nor installs adequate signage to warn of a 30mph curve, so on the inaugural run the engineer hits the curve at 80 mph.

Construction on a nuclear power plant runs into trouble and so to make a key pressure-bearing component fit, they install an S-bend around a pipe, which causes falsely water level readings. Operators open a valve to reduce what they think is excessively high pressure in the reactor and it melts down.

And all of these get simplified, either initially, or in perpetuity, as operator error. Because operators are cheap and easy to replace. Firing someone and laying the blame on them is cheaper than reassessing and restructuring a management culture built on passing the buck.

image

This is an extremely valuable addition thank you selky ❤️

related pet peeve as someone who used to work on industrial machinery: blaming the technique of the person that fabricated it, specifically (nine times out of ten) blaming the welder. Plane crashes, structural failures, car accidents, pressure vessel explosions, nuclear incidents, and even the loss of entire ships and submarines have all been blamed on “bad welds” (i.e. poor welding technique, or welds not conforming to the print) when that’s simply a bad way to look at it; it’s finding one worker to blame and then not doing anything to fix the problem. In critical applications, there should simply never be a situation where a bad weld causes a catastrophic failure, for three reasons:

  1. QC should have caught it.
  2. if QC didn’t/couldn’t catch it, it should have been engineered redundantly so that one bad weld wouldn’t cause total collapse, and it should have been subjected to regular inspections.
  3. if there is no way to get around a single cracked weld as a failure mode, it should have been designed with the knowledge that eventual failure is effectively inevitable as stress fractures and corrosion weaken the joint over time, i.e., fail-safes should have been in place.

so if that’s the case, if there are supposed to be reduncancies, why do welders keep taking the blame?

a) Welds are most often made by human welders, especially in critical applications like nuclear reactors, aerospace parts, pipelines, bridges and buildings, and repair/retrofitting of existing parts (e.g. automotive repair, though mostly not auto fab anymore) where the use of robots is unfeasible. this means that all the above issues re: “operator error” apply. There’s a human being you can pass the buck to and say “he did it.”

b) Welds (or, more often, the surrounding HAZ) are almost invariably the point of failure when a welded part is subjected to extreme stress. If you find your big important contraption (plane, boat, bridge, nuclear reactor, whatever) in pieces and it’s cracked along the welds, the welder is going to logically be the person you blame. Not the engineer (or lack thereof), not the QC department (or lack thereof), not the boss that didn’t provide adequate time, materials, or conditions to make a cleaner joint, not the fitter who left a huge gap in the fitup nor the project manager who didn’t budget for redoing mis-cut parts, not the malfunctioning machine with dodgy voltage controls that the shop refuses to replace because “it still works,” not the foreman who was rushing the workers to reduce the amount of billable time spent on each task so that his team metrics would look better - when you see a part fail, it’s easiest to blame the person who physically made it, so that’s who gets blamed.

Looking for someone to blame is never a good way to deal with the results of a whole system going wrong, because you will definitely just be pointing fingers at the last guy to touch it.

image text:

#you’re so Fucking Right ty for the elaboration#funny story: my workplace has what we’ll call a Fuckup Documenting System (FDS)#and one part of that FDS is a tool to figure out the root cause of said fuckup#one of those cause categories is essentially overworked/stressed#the people who approve/deny the FDS reports Will Not Allow us to use that reason! almost literally an auto-rejection#because we can’t acknowledge that we overwork our staff#my job isn’t as dangerous as what you’re describing but it isn’t completely safe either#so idk I guess I’m trying to say that God Damn yr so right and also haha I’ve experienced this 🙃

image

There’s absolutely no way to blame a person who wasn’t trained. It’s 100% a management issue.

[id:

#There’s also the ones where an undertrained operator is used #And like #OK there’s some blame here #But who hired them #Did they check credentials #Was the credential check thorough enough #Because I have heard of multiple cases where untrained people were hired because they’re cheaper #And then those untrained people go to gaol because they were operating equipment without adequate licenses #And in a lot of cases they didn’t know the job wasn’t entry level or didn’t come with training #Like their actions directly caused the disaster but they’re really the least responsible]

(via reign-of-crows)

cosmogyros:

yellbug:

hey when you make posts, i just want you to know, thou/thee/thy/thine/ye are like he/you(object)/your/yours/you(subject) okay? “thou art wearing shoes,” “i will wear shoes for thee,” okay?

you say thine if the next word starts with a vowel and thy if the next word starts with a consonant and they both mean “your” so “thine own shoes,” “thy shoes,” okay?

and ye means you and refers to the subject of a sentence, “ye members of the brotherhood of shoes,” okay? you need this information to create better knight yaoi. i’m personally more interested in nun yuri but we are a community

Okay, this is mostly correct but still has a few misleading omissions that appear to be confusing people, so I will once again beg everybody to go look this up from an actual academic source (no, not ChatGPT; no, not Reddit; no, not Quora; no, not Stack Exchange) if you really care about getting it right. Something like this. Or even just the Wikipedia articles for thou and ye.

1. I assume OP stuck a “he” in here (which is confusing people in the notes) as an attempt to indicate that “thou” is in the nominative case. Because “he” is another word that’s in the nominative case. Even though it means something completely different.

2. All the words beginning with “t” (thou/thee/thy/thine) are the informal singular. That means you use them only when addressing an individual that you’re relatively intimate with. “Ye” and “you”, on the other hand, can be either plural or formal (or both). So if you’re talking to multiple people and/or people in a higher social position, you’d use ye/you instead.

3. “Thou” is the subject and “thee” is the object. Thus, thou performeth an action, but an action is done to thee.

4. Similarly, “ye” is the subject and “you” is the object. (For groups of people and for individuals of high rank, remember.)

5. OP’s explanation of thy/thine is almost correct: it’s exactly the same word and merely varies depending on the initial sound of the word immediately following it. So if the following word starts with a consonant sound (like “dog” or “yellow” or “university”), you’d use “thy”. If it starts with a vowel sound (like “egg” or “owl” or “heir”), you’d use “thine”.

6. “Thine” is also the informal singular equivalent of “yours”. “It is yours”, converted to the informal singular, becomes “It is thine.” You would never say “It is thy.”

7. Also, addressing some of the comments in the notes: this is not “Old English”. The corresponding Old English pronouns would be þu/þec/þe/þin (singular), git/incit/inc/incer (dual) and ge/eowic/eow/eower (plural). Old English clearly has nothing to do with all this.

But most importantly: This stuff is actually rather complicated and the best way to learn it properly is by reading lots of Early Modern English and picking it up automatically. But that takes years and lots of effort, and if you want to write knight yaoi, honestly you should just go ahead and do it without worrying about getting this stuff right. Just know that you’re probably not getting it right, and that’s fine, and most of your readers won’t know or care. And don’t necessarily trust random people on Tumblr to understand these sorts of linguistic rules correctly.*

*Yes, that includes me. If, despite my exhortation in that last paragraph above, you still decide you want to learn to use all these pronouns properly, then please don’t trust ANY post on Tumblr, including this one, to be your “Holy Grail” explanation. As I said at the beginning: if this truly matters to you, do a few minutes of proper research and find a trustworthy academic source.

This post is going around again with sooooo much misinformation in the notes, so I am reblogging my own explanation above :’)

salvadorbonaparte:

German Listening Comprehension: Buying train tickets in Germany by Fabi Rommel

(via wannabe-all)