The Relativity of Theory: Key Positions and Arguments in the Contemporary Scientific Realism/Antirealism Debate

Front Cover
Springer Nature, Sep 29, 2020 - Science - 171 pages
This book offers a close and rigorous examination of the arguments for and against scientific realism and introduces key positions in the scientific realism/antirealism debate, which is one of the central debates in contemporary philosophy of science. On the one hand, scientific realists argue that we have good reasons to believe that our best scientific theories are approximately true because, if they were not even approximately true, they would not be able to explain and predict natural phenomena with such impressive accuracy. On the other hand, antirealists argue that the success of science does not warrant belief in the approximate truth of our best scientific theories. This is because the history of science is a graveyard of theories that were once successful but were later discarded. The author eventually settles on a middle-ground position between scientific realism and antirealism called “relative realism”.

Contents

Introduction
1
Glossary
15
Realism Versus Antirealism in Contemporary Philosophy of Science
19
Glossary
32
Key Positions in the Contemporary Scientific RealismAntirealism Debate
35
Glossary
46
Key Arguments for Scientific Realism
50
Glossary
73
Key Arguments Against Scientific Realism
79
Glossary
104
Relative Realism The Best of Both Worlds
109
Glossary
156
Glossary
163
Author Index
167
Subject Index
169
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2020)

Moti Mizrahi is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Florida Institute of Technology. He is the editor of The Kuhnian Image of Science: Time for a Decisive Transformation? (Rowman & Littlefield, 2018). He is an Associate and Book Reviews Editor of Philosophia (Springer). He has published extensively on the philosophy of science, the scientific realism/antirealism debate, the epistemology of philosophy, and argumentation. His work has appeared in journals such as Argumentation, Erkenntnis, Philosophical Studies, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, and Synthese.

Bibliographic information